PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFAAX vs. JFRDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D (JFRDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFAAX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than JFRDX's 5.02% return.


HFAAX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.95%
6M
-0.21%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
2.56%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
1.82%
ALL TIME*
3.34%

JFRDX

1D
2.82%
1M
1.99%
6M
10.22%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
9.85%
3Y*
19.94%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
0.10%5.75%1.52%6.35%-16.76%-0.78%9.16%9.50%0.38%5.26%
JFRDX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D
5.02%18.31%28.26%40.01%-33.58%22.73%39.22%36.75%1.49%16.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HFAAX and JFRDX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017

0.10

Over the past year, HFAAX and JFRDX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFAAX vs. JFRDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HFAAX
HFAAX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HFAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
HFAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

JFRDX
JFRDX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
JFRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JFRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) and Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D (JFRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HFAAXJFRDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.12

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

0.63

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.30

1.90

+2.39

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the JFRDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFAAX and JFRDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFAAX drawdown since its inception was -44.89%, which is greater than JFRDX's maximum drawdown of -40.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFAAX and JFRDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFAAXJFRDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.89%

-40.91%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-19.05%

+16.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.27%

-22.14%

+16.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.61%

-40.91%

+19.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-3.62%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.17%

-8.12%

+2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.63%

6.29%

-5.66%

Volatility

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund (HFAAX) is 0.92%, while Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D (JFRDX) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that HFAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JFRDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFAAXJFRDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

7.01%

-6.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.09%

16.10%

-14.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35%

19.69%

-17.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.88%

22.40%

-16.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.72%

22.12%

-17.40%

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFAAX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than JFRDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFAAX vs. JFRDX - Dividend Comparison

HFAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than JFRDX's 12.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFAAX
Janus Henderson Developed World Bond Fund
3.74%3.51%2.90%2.32%8.76%1.33%4.31%3.44%4.86%2.69%2.44%3.34%
JFRDX
Janus Henderson Forty Fund Class D
12.47%13.10%11.27%9.12%0.06%10.12%8.26%7.21%8.88%9.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFAAX and JFRDX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFRDX has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to HFAAX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFAAX dropped -44.89% vs JFRDX's -40.91%.

HFAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFAAX and JFRDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer