PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEZU vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEZU vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HEZU having a 8.75% return and ACWI slightly higher at 9.12%. Over the past 10 years, HEZU has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 11.73%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.43% annualized return.


HEZU

1D
-1.81%
1M
0.51%
YTD
8.75%
6M
10.10%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
11.73%

ACWI

1D
-2.98%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
9.12%
6M
9.60%
1Y
25.76%
3Y*
19.97%
5Y*
10.68%
10Y*
12.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEZU vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
8.75%25.93%10.63%22.98%-9.54%23.51%0.52%29.48%-10.23%14.26%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
9.12%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between HEZU and ACWI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2014

0.81

The correlation between HEZU and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEZU vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEZU
ACWI

Financial Services

24.4%
16.1%

Industrials

21.2%
10.9%

Technology

14.5%
29.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.3%

Utilities

6.8%
2.6%

Healthcare

5.8%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
5.0%

Energy

4.2%
4.2%

Basic Materials

4.1%
3.7%

Communication Services

4.1%
9.0%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

HEZU
24.4%
ACWI
16.1%

Industrials

HEZU
21.2%
ACWI
10.9%

Technology

HEZU
14.5%
ACWI
29.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HEZU
8.4%
ACWI
9.3%

Utilities

HEZU
6.8%
ACWI
2.6%

Healthcare

HEZU
5.8%
ACWI
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

HEZU
5.6%
ACWI
5.0%

Energy

HEZU
4.2%
ACWI
4.2%

Basic Materials

HEZU
4.1%
ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

HEZU
4.1%
ACWI
9.0%

Real Estate

HEZU
1.0%
ACWI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEZU vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEZU
HEZU Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HEZU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEZU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEZU Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HEZU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEZU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEZU vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEZUACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

2.66

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.61

11.88

-5.27

HEZU vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEZU Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEZU and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEZUACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.97

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.67

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.73

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.42

+0.15

Drawdowns

HEZU vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEZU drawdown since its inception was -38.80%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEZU and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEZUACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.80%

-56.00%

+17.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-9.73%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.83%

-16.55%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.79%

-26.42%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.80%

-33.53%

-5.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-3.49%

+1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-8.61%

+2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

2.17%

+0.66%

Volatility

HEZU vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF (HEZU) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 4.59%. This indicates that HEZU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEZUACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

4.59%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

10.76%

+1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.10%

13.15%

+1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

16.10%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.43%

17.13%

+1.30%

HEZU vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEZU has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEZU vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

HEZU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than ACWI's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.42%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
HEZU
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Eurozone ETF
2.69%2.92%2.77%2.52%23.26%2.25%2.32%5.40%3.48%1.92%3.11%2.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEZU and ACWI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEZU has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to ACWI (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEZU dropped -38.80% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.43% vs 11.73% for HEZU. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.43% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for HEZU.

HEZU has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.42% for ACWI.

HEZU is categorized as Europe Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. HEZU tracks MSCI EMU 100% USD Hedged Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for HEZU and 0.32% for ACWI.

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEZU and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer