HEWJ vs. MJSC
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and MJSC (MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF) are both Japan Equities funds. HEWJ is passively managed, while MJSC is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MJSC.
Performance
HEWJ vs. MJSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly lower than MJSC's 22.08% return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- -4.63%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 20.58%
- 1Y
- 53.42%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.50%
- 10Y*
- 17.36%
MJSC
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 22.08%
- 6M
- 21.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEWJ vs. MJSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 20.65% | 11.24% |
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF | 22.08% | -0.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and MJSC is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. MJSC — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
MJSC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HEWJ vs. MJSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF (MJSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEWJ | MJSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. MJSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, which is greater than MJSC's maximum drawdown of -12.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and MJSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | MJSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -12.63% | -18.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.63% | -3.44% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -2.94% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. MJSC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | MJSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.51% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 20.85% | -0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 20.85% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.52% | 20.85% | -1.33% |
HEWJ vs. MJSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MJSC's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. MJSC - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than MJSC's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.23% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
MJSC MUFG Japan Small Cap Active ETF | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWJ and MJSC have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEWJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEWJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MJSC.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 0.54% for MJSC.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and MUFG. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.85% for MJSC.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and MJSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer