HEWJ vs. IWM
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ returned 17.39%/yr vs 11.63%/yr for IWM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
HEWJ vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HEWJ having a 20.99% return and IWM slightly higher at 21.03%. Over the past 10 years, HEWJ has outperformed IWM with an annualized return of 17.39%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.63% annualized return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 20.99%
- 6M
- 21.45%
- 1Y
- 53.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.51%
- 5Y*
- 21.47%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 21.03%
- 6M
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- 39.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
HEWJ vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 20.99% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 21.47% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 21.03% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and IWM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between HEWJ and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEWJ vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
IWM
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
HEWJ
IWM
Industrials
HEWJ
IWM
Financial Services
HEWJ
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
IWM
Communication Services
HEWJ
IWM
Healthcare
HEWJ
IWM
Basic Materials
HEWJ
IWM
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
IWM
Real Estate
HEWJ
IWM
Utilities
HEWJ
IWM
Energy
HEWJ
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
IWM
HEWJ vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEWJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.33 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.21 | 3.62 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.96 | 12.82 | +7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -59.05% | +27.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -11.03% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -27.50% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -31.91% | +11.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | -41.13% | +9.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -0.50% | -3.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -10.74% | +4.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.11% | -0.41% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 6.52%. This indicates that HEWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 6.52% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 14.30% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.95% | 19.71% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.60% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 23.06% | -3.55% |
HEWJ vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than IWM's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.22% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.90% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWJ and IWM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEWJ has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to IWM (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, HEWJ leads with 17.39% vs 11.63% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 17.39% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
HEWJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 0.90% for IWM.
HEWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.19% for IWM.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer