HEWJ vs. FLJP
HEWJ (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF) and FLJP (Franklin FTSE Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - HEWJ tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index while FLJP tracks the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEWJ returned 21.44%/yr vs 9.10%/yr for FLJP. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLJP.
Performance
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEWJ achieves a 20.76% return, which is significantly higher than FLJP's 16.57% return.
HEWJ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 20.76%
- 6M
- 22.79%
- 1Y
- 54.14%
- 3Y*
- 29.48%
- 5Y*
- 21.44%
- 10Y*
- 16.27%
FLJP
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 5.41%
- YTD
- 16.57%
- 6M
- 16.88%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- —
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 20.76% | 30.25% | 24.80% | 36.21% | -4.39% | 12.79% | 10.29% | 20.79% | -14.68% | 1.20% |
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 16.57% | 26.79% | 6.99% | 20.00% | -16.57% | 0.99% | 15.76% | 18.99% | -14.01% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEWJ and FLJP is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.84 |
The correlation between HEWJ and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEWJ
FLJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
HEWJ
FLJP
Technology
HEWJ
FLJP
Financial Services
HEWJ
FLJP
Consumer Cyclical
HEWJ
FLJP
Communication Services
HEWJ
FLJP
Healthcare
HEWJ
FLJP
Consumer Defensive
HEWJ
FLJP
Basic Materials
HEWJ
FLJP
Real Estate
HEWJ
FLJP
Utilities
HEWJ
FLJP
Energy
HEWJ
FLJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEWJ vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank
HEWJ
FLJP
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEWJ | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.33 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 2.50 | +2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.60 | 8.74 | +11.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEWJ | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 1.76 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 0.52 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.45 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEWJ drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJP drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEWJ and FLJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEWJ | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.53% | -32.49% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -13.30% | +2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -14.17% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.90% | -32.49% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -9.37% | +2.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.80% | -1.16% |
Volatility
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF (HEWJ) is 3.70%, while Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that HEWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEWJ | FLJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 3.99% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | 14.71% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 18.88% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 17.74% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.79% | +1.86% |
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLJP's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEWJ vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison
HEWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than FLJP's 4.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLJP Franklin FTSE Japan ETF | 4.42% | 5.15% | 4.56% | 3.00% | 1.92% | 2.40% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 1.50% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEWJ iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | 4.22% | 5.10% | 2.20% | 2.02% | 47.68% | 2.03% | 1.20% | 2.78% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.88% | 3.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEWJ and FLJP have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLJP has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to HEWJ (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEWJ dropped -31.53% vs FLJP's -32.49%.
On 5-year performance, HEWJ leads with 21.44% vs 9.10% for FLJP. On fees, FLJP is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, HEWJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HEWJ has performed better with a 21.44% return vs 9.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLJP is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HEWJ.
FLJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 4.22% for HEWJ.
HEWJ tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to USD Index, while FLJP tracks FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEWJ and 0.09% for FLJP.
HEWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEWJ and FLJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer