PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HESM vs. QTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HESM vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HESM achieves a 16.29% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 53.29% return.


HESM

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
16.29%
6M
17.48%
1Y
9.64%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*

QTUM

1D
-0.59%
1M
23.63%
YTD
53.29%
6M
50.69%
1Y
95.36%
3Y*
52.22%
5Y*
29.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HESM vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HESM
Hess Midstream LP
16.29%0.56%26.41%14.36%16.62%52.91%-5.29%43.83%-22.84%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
53.29%36.65%50.54%39.86%-28.80%35.18%42.05%47.99%-19.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HESM and QTUM is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018

0.27

The correlation between HESM and QTUM shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HESM vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HESM
HESM Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
HESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
HESM Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HESM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QTUM
QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HESM vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HESMQTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.55

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

6.28

-5.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.76

23.69

-22.93

HESM vs. QTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HESM Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the QTUM Sharpe Ratio of 3.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HESM and QTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HESMQTUMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

3.65

-3.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.10

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.08

-0.75

Drawdowns

HESM vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HESM drawdown since its inception was -75.16%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HESM and QTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HESMQTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.16%

-38.45%

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.78%

-15.26%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.78%

-25.39%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.72%

-38.45%

+9.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.55%

-0.59%

-4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-8.25%

-3.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.65%

4.04%

+8.61%

Volatility

HESM vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is 8.24%, while Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a volatility of 9.76%. This indicates that HESM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HESMQTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.24%

9.76%

-1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.00%

20.35%

-5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.20%

26.26%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

26.56%

+0.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.86%

27.17%

+11.69%

Dividends

HESM vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

HESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than QTUM's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HESM
Hess Midstream LP
7.89%8.41%7.12%7.50%7.30%6.93%8.86%6.89%8.00%2.93%
QTUM
Defiance Quantum ETF
0.70%1.01%0.61%0.81%1.46%0.48%0.42%0.61%0.21%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HESM and QTUM have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to HESM (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HESM dropped -75.16% vs QTUM's -38.45%.

QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HESM and QTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer