HESM vs. MPLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and MPLX LP (MPLX).

Performance

HESM vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and MPLX LP (MPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HESM vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HESM Hess Midstream LP	15.11%	0.56%	26.41%	14.36%	16.62%	52.91%	-5.29%	43.83%	-8.61%	-20.37%
MPLX MPLX LP	9.03%	20.54%	41.72%	22.46%	21.09%	53.92%	-1.79%	-8.25%	-8.43%	0.91%

Fundamentals

EPS HESM : $2.78 MPLX : $7.24
PE Ratio HESM : 14.01 MPLX : 7.88
PEG Ratio HESM : 1.13 MPLX : 0.14
PS Ratio HESM : 3.05 MPLX : 2.98
Total Revenue (TTM) HESM : $1.62B MPLX : $13.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) HESM : $1.21B MPLX : $4.69B
EBITDA (TTM) HESM : $1.24B MPLX : $6.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HESM achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than MPLX's 9.03% return.

HESM

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: 19.49%
• 10Y*: —

MPLX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 15.36%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 27.90%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HESM vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HESM

HESM Risk / Return Rank: 38
HESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
HESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
HESM Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HESM Martin Ratio Rank: 41

MPLX

MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HESM vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HESM	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	0.82	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	1.19	-1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.16	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	1.07	-1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.06	3.80	-3.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HESM vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HESM Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HESM and MPLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HESM	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	0.82	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	1.44	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.39	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between HESM and MPLX is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HESM vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

HESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than MPLX's 7.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HESM Hess Midstream LP	7.63%	8.41%	7.12%	7.50%	7.30%	6.93%	8.86%	6.89%	8.00%	2.93%	0.00%	0.00%
MPLX MPLX LP	7.12%	7.39%	7.33%	8.65%	8.80%	11.30%	12.70%	10.41%	8.22%	6.23%	5.86%	4.33%

Drawdowns

HESM vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HESM drawdown since its inception was -75.16%, smaller than the maximum MPLX drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HESM and MPLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HESM	MPLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.16%	-85.72%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.78%	-13.38%	-12.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.72%	-18.46%	-10.26%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.21%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	-3.55%	-1.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.92%	-30.33%	+18.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.65%	3.75%	+9.90%

Volatility

HESM vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and MPLX LP (MPLX) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HESM	MPLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	3.97%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	11.15%	+1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.75%	18.89%	+7.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.33%	19.54%	+7.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.04%	30.91%	+8.13%

Financials

HESM vs. MPLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hess Midstream LP and MPLX LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HESM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported a gross profit of 257.20M and revenue of 404.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

MPLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HESM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported an operating income of 251.60M and revenue of 404.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.3%.

MPLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

HESM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported a net income of 93.30M and revenue of 404.20M, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.

MPLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.