HESM vs. WES

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES).

Performance

HESM vs. WES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HESM vs. WES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HESM Hess Midstream LP	15.11%	0.56%	26.41%	14.36%	16.62%	52.91%	-5.29%	43.83%	-8.61%	-20.37%
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP	6.57%	12.77%	43.58%	19.46%	29.29%	72.31%	-19.13%	-22.65%	-20.23%	-17.13%

Fundamentals

Market Cap HESM : $5.03B WES : $16.57B
EPS HESM : $2.78 WES : $3.03
PE Ratio HESM : 14.01 WES : 13.57
PEG Ratio HESM : 1.13 WES : 0.98
PS Ratio HESM : 3.05 WES : 4.17
PB Ratio HESM : 11.79 WES : 3.98
Total Revenue (TTM) HESM : $1.62B WES : $3.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) HESM : $1.21B WES : $2.93B
EBITDA (TTM) HESM : $1.24B WES : $2.11B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HESM achieves a 15.11% return, which is significantly higher than WES's 6.57% return.

HESM

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: -0.34%
• 3Y*: 19.30%
• 5Y*: 19.49%
• 10Y*: —

WES

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -1.01%
• YTD: 6.57%
• 6M: 9.73%
• 1Y: 10.36%
• 3Y*: 27.25%
• 5Y*: 26.64%
• 10Y*: 10.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HESM vs. WES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HESM

HESM Risk / Return Rank: 38
HESM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
HESM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
HESM Omega Ratio Rank: 34
HESM Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
HESM Martin Ratio Rank: 41

WES

WES Risk / Return Rank: 55
WES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WES Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WES Omega Ratio Rank: 50
WES Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
WES Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HESM vs. WES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hess Midstream LP (HESM) and Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HESM	WES	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	0.45	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.16	0.72	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.10	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.03	0.57	-0.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.06	1.74	-1.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HESM vs. WES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HESM Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the WES Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HESM and WES, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HESM	WES	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01	0.45	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.91	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.22	+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between HESM and WES is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

HESM vs. WES - Dividend Comparison

HESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, less than WES's 8.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HESM Hess Midstream LP	7.63%	8.41%	7.12%	7.50%	7.30%	6.93%	8.86%	6.89%	8.00%	2.93%	0.00%	0.00%
WES Western Midstream Partners, LP	8.84%	9.13%	8.33%	8.52%	6.80%	5.69%	11.25%	12.45%	8.28%	5.43%	4.03%	3.86%

Drawdowns

HESM vs. WES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HESM drawdown since its inception was -75.16%, smaller than the maximum WES drawdown of -93.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HESM and WES.

Drawdown Indicators

	HESM	WES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.16%	-93.66%	+18.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.78%	-15.91%	-9.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.72%	-23.54%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-91.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	-6.22%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.92%	-28.86%	+16.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.65%	5.19%	+8.46%

Volatility

HESM vs. WES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hess Midstream LP (HESM) is 3.90%, while Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that HESM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HESM	WES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.90%	5.82%	-1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.90%	14.07%	-1.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.75%	23.20%	+3.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.33%	29.59%	-2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.04%	46.92%	-7.88%

Financials

HESM vs. WES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hess Midstream LP and Western Midstream Partners, LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

HESM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported a gross profit of 257.20M and revenue of 404.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

WES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 805.90M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.1%.

HESM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported an operating income of 251.60M and revenue of 404.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.3%.

WES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported an operating income of 305.56M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.6%.

HESM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Hess Midstream LP reported a net income of 93.30M and revenue of 404.20M, resulting in a net margin of 23.1%.

WES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Western Midstream Partners, LP reported a net income of 198.57M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 19.3%.