PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEQT vs. LAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEQT vs. LAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQT achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than LAPR's 3.36% return.


HEQT

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.33%
YTD
4.92%
6M
5.48%
1Y
14.78%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
10Y*

LAPR

1D
0.04%
1M
0.76%
YTD
3.36%
6M
3.65%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQT vs. LAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
4.92%10.08%12.63%
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
3.36%5.81%4.82%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQT and LAPR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024

0.65

The correlation between HEQT and LAPR shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEQT vs. LAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQT
HEQT Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HEQT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LAPR
LAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
LAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
LAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQT vs. LAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HEQTLAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

2.93

-1.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

29.40

-26.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

144.85

-131.50

HEQT vs. LAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQT Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is lower than the LAPR Sharpe Ratio of 5.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQT and LAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HEQTLAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

5.58

-3.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.98

-0.89

Drawdowns

HEQT vs. LAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQT drawdown since its inception was -11.51%, which is greater than LAPR's maximum drawdown of -3.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQT and LAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEQTLAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-3.81%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-0.24%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.08%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-0.11%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

0.05%

+1.06%

Volatility

HEQT vs. LAPR - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Hedged Equity ETF (HEQT) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April (LAPR) at 0.32%. This indicates that HEQT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEQTLAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

0.32%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.27%

1.00%

+4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.38%

1.26%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.47%

3.30%

+5.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

3.30%

+5.17%

HEQT vs. LAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQT has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than LAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEQT vs. LAPR - Dividend Comparison

HEQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than LAPR's 5.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HEQT
Simplify Hedged Equity ETF
1.19%1.19%1.29%4.10%3.94%0.27%
LAPR
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - April
5.52%5.40%4.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEQT and LAPR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEQT has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to LAPR (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQT dropped -11.51% vs LAPR's -3.81%.

On 1-year performance, HEQT leads with 14.78% vs 7.02% for LAPR. On fees, HEQT is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, LAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HEQT has performed better with a 14.78% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HEQT is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LAPR.

LAPR has the higher dividend yield at 5.52%, compared with 1.19% for HEQT.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HEQT and 0.79% for LAPR.

LAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.58 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEQT and LAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer