HEQQ vs. VAMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HEQQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by JPMorgan, while VAMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. Over the past year, HEQQ returned 17.08% vs 18.13% for VAMO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEQQ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.

Performance

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEQQ achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return.

HEQQ

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 4.67%
• 6M: 4.45%
• 1Y: 17.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VAMO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -1.08%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: 5.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	4.67%	17.20%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	3.15%	17.56%

Correlation

The correlation between HEQQ and VAMO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2025	0.31

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HEQQ	VAMO
Technology	53.8%	8.3%
Communication Services	15.3%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	33.5%
Consumer Defensive	6.9%	6.5%
Healthcare	4.7%	17.5%
Industrials	3.0%	21.4%
Utilities	1.8%	1.6%
Basic Materials	0.7%	7.3%
Energy	0.7%	34.0%
Financial Services	0.6%	38.8%
Real Estate	0.2%	-

Return for Risk

HEQQ vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEQQ

HEQQ Risk / Return Rank: 59
HEQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
HEQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
HEQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
HEQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
HEQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 52
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEQQ	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.63	+0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	2.40	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.28	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	3.28	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	9.47	-0.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the VAMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEQQ and VAMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEQQ	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	1.63	+0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.24	+1.50

Drawdowns

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEQQ drawdown since its inception was -7.64%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEQQ and VAMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEQQ	VAMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-41.84%	+34.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.64%	-5.55%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-2.76%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.11%	-9.98%	+8.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	1.92%	+0.01%

Volatility

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) is 1.33%, while Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that HEQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEQQ	VAMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.33%	2.97%	-1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.63%	7.66%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.14%	11.19%	-3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.89%	17.34%	-6.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.89%	18.09%	-7.20%

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEQQ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEQQ vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

HEQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than VAMO's 0.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HEQQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.19%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.63%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEQQ and VAMO in my portfolio?

HEQQ and VAMO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HEQQ or VAMO?

VAMO has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to HEQQ (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEQQ dropped -7.64% vs VAMO's -41.84%.

Which ETF is better, HEQQ or VAMO?

On 1-year performance, VAMO leads with 18.13% vs 17.08% for HEQQ. On fees, HEQQ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HEQQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HEQQ or VAMO?

Over the 1-year period, VAMO has performed better with a 18.13% return vs 17.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEQQ or VAMO?

HEQQ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEQQ or VAMO?

VAMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.19% for HEQQ.

What is the main difference between HEQQ and VAMO?

HEQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VAMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEQQ and 0.65% for VAMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HEQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.