HEMI vs. QYLD
HEMI (Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEMI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hartford Funds, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. HEMI is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEMI charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
HEMI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEMI achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.65% return.
HEMI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 6M
- 5.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
HEMI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.99% | 0.75% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.65% | 1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEMI and QYLD is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | 0.87 |
HEMI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEMI
QYLD
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
HEMI
QYLD
Communication Services
HEMI
QYLD
Financial Services
HEMI
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
HEMI
QYLD
Industrials
HEMI
QYLD
Healthcare
HEMI
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
HEMI
QYLD
Energy
HEMI
QYLD
Utilities
HEMI
QYLD
Basic Materials
HEMI
QYLD
Real Estate
HEMI
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEMI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
HEMI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QYLD
HEMI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF (HEMI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEMI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 24.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEMI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEMI drawdown since its inception was -7.80%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEMI and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEMI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -24.75% | +16.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -2.32% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -3.82% | +2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
HEMI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEMI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 9.69% | +3.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 14.84% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 15.55% | -1.97% |
HEMI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEMI has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEMI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
HEMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than QYLD's 11.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF | 3.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.71% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEMI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEMI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEMI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.71%, compared with 3.54% for HEMI.
HEMI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Hartford Funds and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HEMI and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for HEMI and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer