HELS vs. HTUS
HELS (Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF) and HTUS (Hull Tactical US ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HELS is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Hedgeye, while HTUS is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. HELS charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HTUS.
Performance
HELS vs. HTUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HELS achieves a -1.75% return, which is significantly lower than HTUS's 15.74% return.
HELS
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HTUS
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 15.46%
- YTD
- 15.74%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 22.23%
- 5Y*
- 15.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.96%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $184.77K | $173.29K | $282.83K | |
| $562.33K | $518.25K | $624.71K |
HELS vs. HTUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | -1.75% | -2.37% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 15.74% | 0.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HELS and HTUS is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HELS vs. HTUS — Risk / Return Rank
HELS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HTUS
HELS vs. HTUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS) and Hull Tactical US ETF (HTUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HELS | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HELS vs. HTUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HELS drawdown since its inception was -13.60%, smaller than the maximum HTUS drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HELS and HTUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HELS | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -47.50% | +33.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.94% | 0.00% | -7.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -4.02% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
HELS vs. HTUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HELS | HTUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.96% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.47% | 12.43% | +3.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 19.14% | -3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 21.52% | -6.05% |
HELS vs. HTUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HELS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than HTUS's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
HELS vs. HTUS - Dividend Comparison
HELS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than HTUS's 10.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HTUS Hull Tactical US ETF | 10.27% | 11.89% | 17.80% | 1.18% | 5.63% | 7.20% | 3.77% | 0.92% | 8.69% | 8.29% | 3.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HELS and HTUS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HELS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HELS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HTUS.
HTUS has the higher dividend yield at 10.27%, compared with 0.02% for HELS.
HELS is categorized as Long-Short, while HTUS is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HELS and 0.96% for HTUS.
Find the right allocation for HELS and HTUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer