HEFT vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. HEFT is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

HEFT vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

HEFT

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.12%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEFT vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	7.91%	0.98%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

HEFT vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEFT	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.44	-0.25	+1.69

Drawdowns

HEFT vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEFT	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.17%	-30.34%	+21.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	0.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.64%	-27.23%	+24.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.13%	-20.90%	+17.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HEFT	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	0.00%	+12.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.53%	12.66%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.53%	13.32%	-0.79%

HEFT vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEFT vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF	0.02%	0.02%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, HEFT or SENT?

On fees, HEFT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEFT or SENT?

HEFT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEFT or SENT?

HEFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between HEFT and SENT?

They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 1.01% for SENT.