HEFT vs. ATTR
HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEFT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
HEFT vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFT achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than ATTR's 4.25% return.
HEFT
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 4.25%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 7.91% | 0.98% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 4.25% | 0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFT and ATTR is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFT vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEFT | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 2.81 | -1.37 |
Drawdowns
HEFT vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFT drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFT and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFT | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -1.76% | -7.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -0.19% | -2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.13% | -0.18% | -2.95% |
Volatility
HEFT vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFT | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.53% | 2.97% | +9.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 2.97% | +9.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.53% | 2.97% | +9.56% |
HEFT vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFT vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFT and ATTR have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HEFT.
HEFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Hedgeye and Arin Risk Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for HEFT and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for HEFT and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer