HEFA vs. ITOT
HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) and ITOT (iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ITOT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEFA returned 12.70%/yr vs 14.42%/yr for ITOT. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for ITOT.
Performance
HEFA vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 13.57% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 9.48% return. Over the past 10 years, HEFA has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 12.70%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.42% annualized return.
HEFA
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- 6M
- 10.08%
- YTD
- 13.57%
- 1Y
- 26.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.79%
ITOT
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- YTD
- 9.48%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.52%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $39.23M | $30.73M | $26.09M | |
| $228.53M | $259.55M | $322.53M |
HEFA vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 13.57% | 24.58% | 13.71% | 20.33% | -4.86% | 19.59% | 2.09% | 27.63% | -9.33% | 16.67% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 9.48% | 17.00% | 23.80% | 26.12% | -19.47% | 25.68% | 20.71% | 30.67% | -5.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFA and ITOT is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HEFA and ITOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEFA vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEFA
ITOT
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
HEFA
ITOT
Industrials
HEFA
ITOT
Technology
HEFA
ITOT
Healthcare
HEFA
ITOT
Consumer Cyclical
HEFA
ITOT
Consumer Defensive
HEFA
ITOT
Basic Materials
HEFA
ITOT
Energy
HEFA
ITOT
Utilities
HEFA
ITOT
Communication Services
HEFA
ITOT
Real Estate
HEFA
ITOT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFA vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank
HEFA
ITOT
HEFA vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEFA | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.04 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | 8.79 | +2.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEFA vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and ITOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFA | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.39% | -55.20% | +22.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.52% | -8.90% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -19.44% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -25.36% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.39% | -35.00% | +2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -2.31% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -6.94% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.29% | 2.06% | +0.23% |
Volatility
HEFA vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFA | ITOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 3.06% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.72% | 10.02% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 12.94% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 17.44% | -3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.66% | 18.25% | -2.59% |
HEFA vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFA vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison
HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than ITOT's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 4.04% | 4.40% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 7.56% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% |
ITOT iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.66% | 1.18% | 1.41% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 1.69% | 1.83% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFA and ITOT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HEFA has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to ITOT (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEFA dropped -32.39% vs ITOT's -55.20%.
On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.42% vs 12.70% for HEFA. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 3.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.42% return vs 12.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HEFA.
HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 1.02% for ITOT.
HEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Blend Equities. HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HEFA and 0.03% for ITOT.
HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEFA and ITOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer