HEFA vs. IBIT
HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HEFA returned 25.95% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
HEFA vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
HEFA
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 12.49%
- 1Y
- 25.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFA vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 10.24% | 24.58% | 13.10% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFA and IBIT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFA vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
HEFA
IBIT
HEFA vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEFA | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | -0.89 | +2.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | -1.23 | +4.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.86 | +0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | -0.79 | +3.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | -1.36 | +12.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEFA | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | -0.89 | +2.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.30 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
HEFA vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFA | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.39% | -49.36% | +16.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.52% | -49.36% | +39.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -48.10% | +47.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -16.02% | +11.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.28% | 28.44% | -26.16% |
Volatility
HEFA vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) is 4.05%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that HEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFA | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 9.50% | -5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.13% | 34.44% | -24.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 43.73% | -31.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 50.19% | -36.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 50.19% | -34.33% |
HEFA vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFA vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.99%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.99% | 4.40% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 7.56% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFA and IBIT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to HEFA (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEFA dropped -32.39% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, HEFA leads with 25.95% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HEFA has performed better with a 25.95% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HEFA.
HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
HEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HEFA and 0.25% for IBIT.
HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEFA and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer