HEFA vs. ACWI
HEFA (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEFA returned 13.44%/yr vs 13.09%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEFA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
HEFA vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEFA achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 9.86% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HEFA having a 13.44% annualized return and ACWI not far behind at 13.09%.
HEFA
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 29.40%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.44%
ACWI
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 9.86%
- 6M
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- 25.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.00%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.09%
HEFA vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 12.09% | 24.58% | 13.71% | 20.33% | -4.86% | 19.59% | 2.09% | 27.63% | -9.33% | 16.67% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 9.86% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -9.19% | 24.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEFA and ACWI is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014 | 0.84 |
The correlation between HEFA and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
HEFA vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEFA
ACWI
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
HEFA
ACWI
Industrials
HEFA
ACWI
Technology
HEFA
ACWI
Healthcare
HEFA
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
HEFA
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
HEFA
ACWI
Basic Materials
HEFA
ACWI
Communication Services
HEFA
ACWI
Utilities
HEFA
ACWI
Energy
HEFA
ACWI
Real Estate
HEFA
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEFA vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
HEFA
ACWI
HEFA vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEFA | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.34 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.64 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.99 | 11.51 | +1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEFA vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEFA drawdown since its inception was -32.39%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEFA and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEFA | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.39% | -56.00% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.52% | -9.73% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.28% | -16.55% | +2.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.79% | -26.42% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.39% | -33.53% | +1.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -2.83% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -8.59% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.23% | +0.04% |
Volatility
HEFA vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) is 4.50%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that HEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEFA | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 5.57% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 11.38% | -0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 13.64% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 16.20% | -2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 17.08% | -1.37% |
HEFA vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEFA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEFA vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
HEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than ACWI's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.45% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
HEFA iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.92% | 4.40% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 25.14% | 3.06% | 2.10% | 7.56% | 4.58% | 2.55% | 3.17% | 3.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEFA and ACWI have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to HEFA (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEFA dropped -32.39% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 10-year performance, HEFA leads with 13.44% vs 13.09% for ACWI. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, HEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HEFA has performed better with a 13.44% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HEFA.
HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.45% for ACWI.
HEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HEFA and 0.32% for ACWI.
HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEFA and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer