HEEM vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HEEM (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEEM is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, HEEM returned 65.93% vs 4.48% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. HEEM charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

HEEM vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 31.07% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.35% return.

HEEM

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 10.58%
• YTD: 31.07%
• 6M: 33.28%
• 1Y: 65.93%
• 3Y*: 27.32%
• 5Y*: 10.71%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.37%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEEM vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	31.07%	34.02%	12.59%	3.59%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.35%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and IBIC is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	-0.04

The correlation between HEEM and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HEEM vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEEM

HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 93
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 94
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 93

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEEM vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEEM	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.75	4.97	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.82	8.97	-4.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	2.21	-0.51
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.13	17.05	-10.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.62	66.57	-41.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEEM vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.75, which is comparable to the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEEM	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.75	4.97	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	3.49	-2.99

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEEM	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.53%	-0.90%	-32.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.83%	-0.26%	-10.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.15%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.14%	-0.10%	-11.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	0.07%	+2.63%

Volatility

HEEM vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.34%. This indicates that HEEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEEM	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.51%	0.34%	+7.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.34%	0.67%	+14.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.65%	0.90%	+16.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.01%	1.58%	+15.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	1.58%	+16.39%

HEEM vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEEM vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	3.03%	3.98%	2.38%	2.75%	7.49%	1.93%	1.49%	3.04%	2.37%	2.05%	1.84%	6.28%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEEM and IBIC in my portfolio?

HEEM and IBIC have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HEEM or IBIC?

HEEM has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to IBIC (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, HEEM or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, HEEM leads with 65.93% vs 4.48% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HEEM or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, HEEM has performed better with a 65.93% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEEM or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEEM or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.03% for HEEM.

What is the main difference between HEEM and IBIC?

HEEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.97 vs 3.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.