HEEM vs. EMM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM).
HEEM and EMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HEEM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2014. EMM is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Sep 24, 2010.
Performance
HEEM vs. EMM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HEEM vs. EMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 6.21% | 34.02% | 12.59% | 5.37% |
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 3.30% | 30.21% | 2.34% | 3.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly higher than EMM's 3.30% return.
HEEM
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 13.27%
- 1Y
- 37.01%
- 3Y*
- 18.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
EMM
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- 1Y
- 41.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HEEM vs. EMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than EMM's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HEEM vs. EMM — Risk / Return Rank
HEEM
EMM
HEEM vs. EMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEEM | EMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 2.11 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.78 | 2.73 | +0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.39 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.74 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 12.09 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEEM | EMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 2.11 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.74 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between HEEM and EMM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HEEM vs. EMM - Dividend Comparison
HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than EMM's 0.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.74% | 3.98% | 2.38% | 2.75% | 7.49% | 1.93% | 1.49% | 3.04% | 2.37% | 2.05% | 1.84% | 6.28% |
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 0.87% | 0.90% | 0.80% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HEEM vs. EMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, which is greater than EMM's maximum drawdown of -21.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and EMM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEEM | EMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.53% | -21.99% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.42% | -14.75% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.64% | -11.39% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.28% | -4.82% | -6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.34% | -0.45% |
Volatility
HEEM vs. EMM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) is 8.92%, while Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that HEEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HEEM | EMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.92% | 11.02% | -2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.25% | 15.75% | -2.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.52% | 19.63% | -2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 17.69% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 17.69% | +0.06% |