EMM vs. ASEA
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA).
EMM and ASEA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMM is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Sep 24, 2010. ASEA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 2011.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EMM or ASEA.
Key characteristics
| EMM | ASEA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.78% | 13.09% |
| 1Y Return | 10.31% | 17.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.79 | 1.41 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.16 | 2.01 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.15 | 1.25 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.05 | 2.50 |
| Martin Ratio | 3.35 | 7.01 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.81% | 2.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.08% | 14.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.61% | -44.13% |
| Current Drawdown | -7.98% | -7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMM and ASEA is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EMM vs. ASEA - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EMM achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly lower than ASEA's 13.09% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMM vs. ASEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ASEA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EMM vs. ASEA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) and Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EMM vs. ASEA - Dividend Comparison
EMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than ASEA's 3.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMM Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 0.94% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ASEA Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF | 3.70% | 3.76% | 2.23% | 4.18% | 2.27% | 2.51% | 3.08% | 1.59% | 2.78% | 3.64% | 2.65% | 3.83% |
Drawdowns
EMM vs. ASEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMM drawdown since its inception was -13.61%, smaller than the maximum ASEA drawdown of -44.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMM and ASEA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EMM vs. ASEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (EMM) is 3.06%, while Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that EMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.