HEEM vs. DIEM

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

HEEM (iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and DIEM (Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - HEEM tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index while DIEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HEEM returned 10.40%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for DIEM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HEEM charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for DIEM.

Performance

HEEM vs. DIEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEEM achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly lower than DIEM's 22.91% return. Over the past 10 years, HEEM has outperformed DIEM with an annualized return of 10.40%, while DIEM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.

HEEM

• 1D: -5.76%
• 1M: -2.36%
• YTD: 20.85%
• 6M: 21.68%
• 1Y: 50.37%
• 3Y*: 23.65%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: 10.40%

DIEM

• 1D: -6.44%
• 1M: -1.51%
• YTD: 22.91%
• 6M: 24.87%
• 1Y: 46.79%
• 3Y*: 24.69%
• 5Y*: 9.78%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HEEM vs. DIEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	20.85%	34.02%	12.59%	10.14%	-16.85%	-1.82%	17.94%	18.53%	-11.09%	27.59%
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	22.91%	30.81%	12.29%	15.41%	-20.61%	6.92%	1.27%	12.23%	-11.29%	27.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HEEM and DIEM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2016	0.88

The correlation between HEEM and DIEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

HEEM vs. DIEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HEEM	DIEM
Technology	37.0%	40.3%
Financial Services	19.4%	23.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	6.7%
Industrials	7.5%	4.7%
Communication Services	6.9%	5.6%
Basic Materials	6.5%	4.2%
Energy	4.0%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	2.9%
Healthcare	2.9%	0.6%
Utilities	2.1%	4.1%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.6%

Return for Risk

HEEM vs. DIEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HEEM

HEEM Risk / Return Rank: 86
HEEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HEEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HEEM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
HEEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
HEEM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

DIEM

DIEM Risk / Return Rank: 78
DIEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
DIEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
DIEM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
DIEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DIEM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HEEM vs. DIEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HEEM	DIEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.43	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.44	3.04	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.47	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.67	3.81	+0.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.40	15.44	+2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HEEM vs. DIEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the DIEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEEM and DIEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HEEM	DIEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	2.43	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	0.57	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.49	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.50	-0.04

Drawdowns

HEEM vs. DIEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEEM drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, smaller than the maximum DIEM drawdown of -38.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEEM and DIEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HEEM	DIEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.53%	-38.61%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.83%	-12.33%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.82%	-16.82%	+2.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.60%	-33.34%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.53%	-38.61%	+5.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.80%	-8.70%	+0.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.13%	-9.71%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.75%	3.04%	-0.29%

Volatility

HEEM vs. DIEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (HEEM) is 9.48%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (DIEM) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that HEEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HEEM	DIEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.48%	10.59%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	17.39%	-0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.71%	19.36%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	17.17%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.06%	17.71%	+0.35%

HEEM vs. DIEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEEM has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than DIEM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

HEEM vs. DIEM - Dividend Comparison

HEEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than DIEM's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIEM Franklin Emerging Market Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	2.48%	2.99%	4.92%	4.45%	6.31%	4.06%	2.75%	5.98%	3.87%	2.61%	0.35%	0.00%
HEEM iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	3.29%	3.98%	2.38%	2.75%	7.49%	1.93%	1.49%	3.04%	2.37%	2.05%	1.84%	6.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HEEM and DIEM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, HEEM and DIEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HEEM or DIEM?

DIEM has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to HEEM (9.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEEM dropped -33.53% vs DIEM's -38.61%.

Which ETF is better, HEEM or DIEM?

On 10-year performance, HEEM leads with 10.40% vs 8.68% for DIEM. On fees, DIEM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, HEEM has been the lower-risk option at 9.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HEEM or DIEM?

Over the 10-year period, HEEM has performed better with a 10.40% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HEEM or DIEM?

DIEM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for HEEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HEEM or DIEM?

HEEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.48% for DIEM.

What is the main difference between HEEM and DIEM?

HEEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets 100% USD Hedged Index, while DIEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Dividend Enhanced Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.72% for HEEM and 0.19% for DIEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HEEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.