HEDG vs. VAMO
HEDG (Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEDG is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Actively Managed, while VAMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Cambria. HEDG is passively managed, while VAMO is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HEDG charges 0.96%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.
Performance
HEDG vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEDG achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than VAMO's 4.86% return.
HEDG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VAMO
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 14.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
HEDG vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 2.51% | 3.20% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 4.86% | 4.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEDG and VAMO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEDG vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank
HEDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VAMO
HEDG vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HEDG | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HEDG vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEDG drawdown since its inception was -3.85%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEDG and VAMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEDG | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -41.84% | +37.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.15% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.39% | -9.93% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.93% | — |
Volatility
HEDG vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEDG | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.87% | 11.20% | -5.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 17.18% | -11.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 18.10% | -12.23% |
HEDG vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEDG has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEDG vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison
HEDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than VAMO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 1.84% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 0.62% | 1.41% | 0.84% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEDG and VAMO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VAMO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VAMO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for HEDG.
HEDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.62% for VAMO.
HEDG is categorized as Equity Hedged, while VAMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Equable Shares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for HEDG and 0.65% for VAMO.
Find the right allocation for HEDG and VAMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer