HEAL vs. PAVE
HEAL (Global X HealthTech ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HEAL is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Global X HealthTech Index, while PAVE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HEAL returned -14.71%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for PAVE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HEAL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
HEAL vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -15.57% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 19.88% return.
HEAL
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- -15.57%
- 6M
- -20.78%
- 1Y
- -22.08%
- 3Y*
- -10.46%
- 5Y*
- -14.71%
- 10Y*
- —
PAVE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 19.88%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 37.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.78%
- 5Y*
- 17.39%
- 10Y*
- —
HEAL vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | -15.57% | -0.62% | -2.87% | -12.61% | -29.99% | -14.21% | 23.87% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 19.88% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 34.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HEAL and PAVE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2020 | 0.52 |
The correlation between HEAL and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HEAL vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HEAL
PAVE
Healthcare
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
HEAL
PAVE
-
Technology
HEAL
PAVE
Basic Materials
HEAL
-
PAVE
Communication Services
HEAL
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
HEAL
-
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
HEAL
-
PAVE
Energy
HEAL
-
PAVE
Financial Services
HEAL
-
PAVE
-
Industrials
HEAL
-
PAVE
Real Estate
HEAL
-
PAVE
-
Utilities
HEAL
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HEAL vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
HEAL
PAVE
HEAL vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HEAL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.34 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.13 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 11.50 | -12.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HEAL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.01 | 1.99 | -3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | 0.81 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 0.68 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
HEAL vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HEAL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.76% | -44.08% | -21.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.71% | -11.91% | -18.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.78% | -26.23% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.36% | -26.23% | -34.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.55% | -1.82% | -61.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -6.24% | -36.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.13% | 3.24% | +11.89% |
Volatility
HEAL vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) is 5.21%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 6.42%. This indicates that HEAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HEAL | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 6.42% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.69% | 15.17% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.89% | 18.84% | +3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.37% | 21.60% | +4.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.18% | 24.38% | +1.80% |
HEAL vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
HEAL vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than PAVE's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEAL Global X HealthTech ETF | 0.39% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HEAL and PAVE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (6.42%) compared to HEAL (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.39% vs -14.71% for HEAL. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, HEAL has been the lower-risk option at 5.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.39% return vs -14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEAL.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.39% for HEAL.
HEAL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PAVE is Utilities Equities. HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.47% for PAVE.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HEAL and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer