PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HEAL vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HEAL vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HEAL achieves a -5.19% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.61% return.


HEAL

1D
2.94%
1M
-4.37%
6M
-2.05%
YTD
-5.19%
1Y
-10.31%
3Y*
-6.93%
5Y*
-12.95%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-9.16%

PAVE

1D
2.09%
1M
0.68%
6M
12.05%
YTD
20.61%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
17.87%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$260.96K$227.88K$213.27K
$108.51M$123.53M$109.57M

HEAL vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
-5.19%-0.62%-2.87%-12.61%-29.99%-14.21%16.89%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.61%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between HEAL and PAVE is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2020

0.50

The correlation between HEAL and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HEAL vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HEAL
PAVE

Healthcare

94.1%

-

Technology

5.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

22.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.3%

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

72.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.5%

Healthcare

HEAL
94.1%
PAVE

-

Technology

HEAL
5.3%
PAVE
1.9%

Basic Materials

HEAL

-

PAVE
22.1%

Communication Services

HEAL

-

PAVE

-

Consumer Cyclical

HEAL

-

PAVE

-

Consumer Defensive

HEAL

-

PAVE
0.3%

Energy

HEAL

-

PAVE
0.2%

Financial Services

HEAL

-

PAVE

-

Industrials

HEAL

-

PAVE
72.3%

Real Estate

HEAL

-

PAVE

-

Utilities

HEAL

-

PAVE
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HEAL vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HEAL
HEAL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HEAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEAL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HEAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEAL Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HEAL vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HEALPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.24

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

2.44

-2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

8.00

-8.61

HEAL vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HEAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HEAL and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HEAL vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HEAL drawdown since its inception was -65.76%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HEAL and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HEALPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.76%

-44.08%

-21.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.71%

-11.91%

-18.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.56%

-26.23%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.14%

-26.23%

-32.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.07%

-3.92%

-55.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.49%

-6.19%

-37.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.90%

3.62%

+13.28%

Volatility

HEAL vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

Global X HealthTech ETF (HEAL) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.40%. This indicates that HEAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HEALPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

6.40%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

16.70%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.91%

20.47%

+2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.67%

21.72%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.27%

24.37%

+1.90%

HEAL vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HEAL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

HEAL vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

HEAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than PAVE's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HEAL
Global X HealthTech ETF
0.26%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.75%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


HEAL and PAVE have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HEAL has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to PAVE (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HEAL dropped -65.76% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.87% vs -12.95% for HEAL. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.87% return vs -12.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEAL.

PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.26% for HEAL.

HEAL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while PAVE is Infrastructure Equities. HEAL tracks Global X HealthTech Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HEAL and 0.47% for PAVE.

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HEAL and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer