HDV vs. NDIV
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and NDIV (Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while NDIV is a Energy Equities fund tracking the EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDV returned 14.94%/yr vs 18.96%/yr for NDIV. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for NDIV.
Performance
HDV vs. NDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 12.69% return, which is significantly lower than NDIV's 32.65% return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
NDIV
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 32.65%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 34.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDV vs. NDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 1.93% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 32.65% | 2.85% | 6.18% | 15.52% | 1.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and NDIV is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between HDV and NDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDV vs. NDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
NDIV
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
NDIV
-
Energy
HDV
NDIV
Healthcare
HDV
NDIV
-
Financial Services
HDV
NDIV
Utilities
HDV
NDIV
-
Technology
HDV
NDIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
NDIV
-
Industrials
HDV
NDIV
-
Basic Materials
HDV
NDIV
Communication Services
HDV
NDIV
-
Real Estate
HDV
-
NDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. NDIV — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
NDIV
HDV vs. NDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.95 | 3.20 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 7.55 | +3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.73 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.73 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
HDV vs. NDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, which is greater than NDIV's maximum drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and NDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -19.73% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -10.73% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -19.73% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -4.08% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -4.20% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 4.55% | -2.70% |
Volatility
HDV vs. NDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 3.19%, while Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF (NDIV) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | NDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 4.65% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 13.38% | -5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.73% | 20.04% | -10.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 20.92% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 20.92% | -5.19% |
HDV vs. NDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NDIV's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. NDIV - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than NDIV's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
NDIV Amplify Natural Resources Dividend Income ETF | 6.53% | 5.64% | 5.88% | 7.37% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and NDIV have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NDIV has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to HDV (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs NDIV's -19.73%.
On 3-year performance, NDIV leads with 18.96% vs 14.94% for HDV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NDIV has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 14.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for NDIV.
NDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 2.91% for HDV.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while NDIV is Energy Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while NDIV tracks EQM Natural Resources Dividend Income Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.59% for NDIV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and NDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer