HDV vs. DIV
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and DIV (Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while DIV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.07%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for DIV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DIV.
Performance
HDV vs. DIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HDV having a 16.32% return and DIV slightly lower at 15.81%. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed DIV with an annualized return of 9.07%, while DIV has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 16.32%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 9.07%
DIV
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- YTD
- 15.81%
- 1Y
- 16.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
HDV vs. DIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 16.32% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 15.81% | 3.10% | 11.27% | -1.73% | -3.92% | 30.60% | -22.85% | 14.50% | -6.60% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and DIV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2013 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HDV and DIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDV vs. DIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
DIV
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
DIV
Healthcare
HDV
DIV
Energy
HDV
DIV
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
DIV
Utilities
HDV
DIV
Communication Services
HDV
DIV
Financial Services
HDV
DIV
Industrials
HDV
DIV
Basic Materials
HDV
DIV
Technology
HDV
DIV
-
Real Estate
HDV
-
DIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. DIV — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
DIV
HDV vs. DIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.26 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.08 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.74 | 8.33 | +2.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. DIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, smaller than the maximum DIV drawdown of -52.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and DIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -52.74% | +15.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -5.23% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -12.33% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -21.14% | +5.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -52.74% | +15.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | 0.00% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -6.98% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.93% | -0.04% |
Volatility
HDV vs. DIV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a higher volatility of 4.56% compared to Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF (DIV) at 3.68%. This indicates that HDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | DIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 3.68% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 7.58% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.46% | 10.62% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 13.69% | -0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 17.99% | -2.24% |
HDV vs. DIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than DIV's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDV vs. DIV - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than DIV's 6.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIV Global X SuperDividend U.S. ETF | 6.64% | 7.30% | 5.74% | 7.13% | 6.62% | 5.24% | 8.01% | 7.65% | 7.08% | 5.92% | 6.78% | 8.44% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.84% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and DIV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to DIV (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs DIV's -52.74%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.07% vs 4.02% for DIV. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.07% return vs 4.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DIV.
DIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 2.84% for HDV.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while DIV is Mid Cap Value Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while DIV tracks Indxx SuperDividend® U.S. Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.45% for DIV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and DIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer