HDUS vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

HDUS (Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. HDUS is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDUS returned 18.87%/yr vs 14.55%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HDUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

HDUS vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HDUS having a 11.35% return and TDVG slightly lower at 10.93%.

HDUS

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 1.22%
• 6M: 9.32%
• YTD: 11.35%
• 1Y: 21.83%
• 3Y*: 18.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.38%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF	$916.25K	$780.33K	$620.02K
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M

HDUS vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF	11.35%	17.17%	23.57%	21.17%	-1.39%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HDUS and TDVG is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022	0.86

The correlation between HDUS and TDVG shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDUS vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDUS	TDVG
Technology	35.1%	27.4%
Financial Services	12.6%	19.3%
Communication Services	10.6%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	6.7%
Industrials	7.6%	14.4%
Healthcare	7.1%	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	6.6%
Real Estate	5.2%	1.5%
Energy	2.9%	4.5%
Utilities	2.2%	3.2%
Basic Materials	1.4%	2.8%

Return for Risk

HDUS vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HDUS

HDUS Risk / Return Rank: 77
HDUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
HDUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
HDUS Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HDUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
HDUS Martin Ratio Rank: 83

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HDUS vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HDUS	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.75	1.87	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.69	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.51	+0.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.42	10.48	+0.94

HDUS vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDUS and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HDUS vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDUS drawdown since its inception was -17.94%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDUS and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDUS	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.94%	-19.20%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.48%	-7.24%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.94%	-14.02%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.92%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-3.67%	+1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.77%	1.73%	+0.04%

Volatility

HDUS vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF (HDUS) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that HDUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDUS	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.07%	2.20%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.81%	7.30%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	9.74%	+1.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.07%	13.87%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.07%	13.81%	+0.26%

HDUS vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDUS vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

HDUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HDUS Hartford Disciplined US Equity ETF	1.30%	1.45%	1.58%	1.36%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDUS and TDVG in my portfolio?

HDUS and TDVG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HDUS or TDVG?

HDUS has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDUS dropped -17.94% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, HDUS or TDVG?

On 3-year performance, HDUS leads with 18.87% vs 14.55% for TDVG. On fees, HDUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HDUS or TDVG?

Over the 3-year period, HDUS has performed better with a 18.87% return vs 14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDUS or TDVG?

HDUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HDUS or TDVG?

HDUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.96% for TDVG.

What is the main difference between HDUS and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for HDUS and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.