HDQVX vs. GLV
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV).
HDQVX is an actively managed fund by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Aug 1, 2012. GLV is managed by Clough Capital. It was launched on Jul 28, 2004.
Performance
HDQVX vs. GLV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDQVX vs. GLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDQVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S | -0.72% | 29.00% | 8.58% | 18.06% | -8.69% | 11.67% | 5.11% | 18.91% | -9.41% | 6.69% |
GLV Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund | 1.90% | 23.01% | 17.85% | -8.45% | -31.93% | 14.47% | 7.91% | 22.40% | -16.22% | 3.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDQVX achieves a -0.72% return, which is significantly lower than GLV's 1.90% return.
HDQVX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -11.03%
- YTD
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- 1Y
- 19.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- —
GLV
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 20.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- -2.15%
- 10Y*
- 4.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDQVX vs. GLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDQVX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GLV's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HDQVX vs. GLV — Risk / Return Rank
HDQVX
GLV
HDQVX vs. GLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDQVX | GLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 1.94 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.61 | -1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.67 | 8.53 | -2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDQVX | GLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | -0.12 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.21 | +0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDQVX and GLV is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HDQVX vs. GLV - Dividend Comparison
HDQVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, less than GLV's 10.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDQVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S | 7.22% | 7.52% | 6.41% | 2.94% | 4.25% | 4.63% | 3.29% | 3.26% | 4.24% | 2.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GLV Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund | 10.86% | 10.57% | 11.64% | 13.92% | 16.99% | 10.82% | 11.67% | 11.17% | 13.68% | 10.00% | 11.26% | 10.69% |
Drawdowns
HDQVX vs. GLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDQVX drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum GLV drawdown of -61.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDQVX and GLV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDQVX | GLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.56% | -61.66% | +33.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -8.33% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.94% | -47.37% | +24.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.03% | -14.28% | +3.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -14.93% | +10.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.54% | +0.48% |
Volatility
HDQVX vs. GLV - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) at 5.45%. This indicates that HDQVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDQVX | GLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 5.45% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.77% | 9.76% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.56% | 15.58% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.39% | 17.65% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.77% | 19.82% | -6.05% |