HDQVX vs. GLV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HDQVX (Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S) and GLV (Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund) are both Global Equity Income funds. Over the past 5 years, HDQVX returned 12.84%/yr vs 1.45%/yr for GLV. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDQVX charges 1.27%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for GLV.

Performance

HDQVX vs. GLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDQVX achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than GLV's 13.72% return.

HDQVX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 16.96%
• 1Y: 28.91%
• 3Y*: 20.65%
• 5Y*: 12.84%
• 10Y*: —

GLV

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.29%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 18.69%
• 5Y*: 1.45%
• 10Y*: 5.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDQVX vs. GLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDQVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S	17.03%	29.00%	8.58%	18.06%	-8.69%	11.67%	5.11%	18.91%	-9.41%	6.69%
GLV Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund	13.72%	23.01%	17.85%	-8.45%	-31.93%	14.47%	7.91%	22.40%	-16.22%	3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between HDQVX and GLV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2017	0.51

The correlation between HDQVX and GLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HDQVX vs. GLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDQVX

HDQVX Risk / Return Rank: 55
HDQVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
HDQVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HDQVX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
HDQVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HDQVX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

GLV

GLV Risk / Return Rank: 68
GLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
GLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
GLV Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
GLV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDQVX vs. GLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) and Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HDQVX	GLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	2.20	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.80	3.15	-0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.40	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	3.50	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.53	11.38	-1.85

HDQVX vs. GLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDQVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the GLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDQVX and GLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HDQVX vs. GLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDQVX drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum GLV drawdown of -61.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDQVX and GLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDQVX	GLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.56%	-61.66%	+33.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-8.21%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.03%	-13.63%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.94%	-47.37%	+24.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.34%	+4.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.51%	-14.87%	+10.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	2.52%	+0.63%

Volatility

HDQVX vs. GLV - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) at 4.86%. This indicates that HDQVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDQVX	GLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.58%	4.86%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.09%	10.72%	+1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.22%	13.06%	+1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.82%	17.18%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	19.88%	-5.98%

HDQVX vs. GLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDQVX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than GLV's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDQVX vs. GLV - Dividend Comparison

HDQVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, less than GLV's 10.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLV Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund	10.19%	10.57%	11.64%	13.92%	16.99%	10.82%	11.67%	11.17%	13.68%	10.00%	11.26%	10.69%
HDQVX Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S	6.44%	7.52%	6.41%	2.94%	4.25%	4.63%	3.29%	3.26%	4.24%	2.16%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDQVX and GLV in my portfolio?

HDQVX and GLV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HDQVX or GLV?

HDQVX has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to GLV (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDQVX dropped -28.56% vs GLV's -61.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.