PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLV vs. NXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLV vs. NXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLV achieves a 14.96% return, which is significantly lower than NXG's 24.88% return.


GLV

1D
0.31%
1M
5.42%
YTD
14.96%
6M
14.96%
1Y
30.94%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
6.11%

NXG

1D
1.21%
1M
4.07%
YTD
24.88%
6M
26.97%
1Y
38.01%
3Y*
35.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLV vs. NXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
GLV
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
14.96%23.01%17.85%-8.45%-4.02%
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
24.88%25.98%51.16%4.54%-4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between GLV and NXG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLV vs. NXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLV
GLV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
GLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NXG
NXG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
NXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
NXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXG Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLV vs. NXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLVNXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.35

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.90

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.31

7.89

+4.42

GLV vs. NXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the NXG Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLV and NXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLV vs. NXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLV drawdown since its inception was -61.66%, which is greater than NXG's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLV and NXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLVNXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.66%

-26.14%

-35.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-13.19%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.63%

-26.14%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.30%

-0.54%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-6.54%

-8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

4.83%

-2.31%

Volatility

GLV vs. NXG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) is 4.67%, while NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) has a volatility of 5.17%. This indicates that GLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLVNXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

5.17%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.65%

13.84%

-3.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.04%

19.41%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

26.77%

-9.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

26.77%

-6.88%

GLV vs. NXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLV has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than NXG's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLV vs. NXG - Dividend Comparison

GLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, less than NXG's 11.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLV
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
10.08%10.57%11.64%13.92%16.99%10.82%11.67%11.17%13.68%10.00%11.26%10.69%
NXG
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund
11.01%12.83%14.15%12.00%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLV and NXG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXG has higher volatility (5.17%) compared to GLV (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLV dropped -61.66% vs NXG's -26.14%.

GLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLV and NXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer