PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLV vs. GLQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLV vs. GLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) and Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GLV having a 12.23% return and GLQ slightly higher at 12.80%. Over the past 10 years, GLV has underperformed GLQ with an annualized return of 5.23%, while GLQ has yielded a comparatively higher 8.69% annualized return.


GLV

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.27%
6M
5.73%
YTD
12.23%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
5.23%
ALL TIME*
5.04%

GLQ

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.09%
6M
4.69%
YTD
12.80%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
-0.73%
10Y*
8.69%
ALL TIME*
6.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$431.68K$488.67K$711.10K
$300.18K$281.30K$314.56K

GLV vs. GLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GLV
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
12.23%23.01%17.85%-8.45%-31.93%14.47%7.91%22.40%-16.22%22.36%
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
12.80%28.55%25.41%2.67%-42.31%6.48%28.28%23.94%-9.74%32.83%

Correlation

The correlation between GLV and GLQ is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2005

0.67

The correlation between GLV and GLQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLV vs. GLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GLV
GLV Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
GLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GLQ
GLQ Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GLV vs. GLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) and Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GLVGLQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.33

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

8.52

+0.59

GLV vs. GLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the GLQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLV and GLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GLV vs. GLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLV drawdown since its inception was -61.66%, roughly equal to the maximum GLQ drawdown of -64.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLV and GLQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLVGLQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.66%

-64.45%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-10.61%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.03%

-19.18%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.37%

-57.47%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.37%

-57.47%

+10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.60%

-8.82%

+3.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.82%

-17.21%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.89%

-0.19%

Volatility

GLV vs. GLQ - Volatility Comparison

Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund (GLV) and Clough Global Equity Fund (GLQ) have volatilities of 3.22% and 3.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLVGLQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.34%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.83%

12.03%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

15.08%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

19.96%

-2.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

22.01%

-2.13%

GLV vs. GLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLV has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GLQ's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GLV vs. GLQ - Dividend Comparison

GLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than GLQ's 10.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLQ
Clough Global Equity Fund
10.29%10.18%10.86%12.13%21.42%12.25%9.66%10.96%13.68%9.63%11.68%11.01%
GLV
Clough Global Dividend and Income Fund
10.48%10.57%11.64%13.92%16.99%10.82%11.67%11.17%13.68%10.00%11.26%10.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLV and GLQ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLQ has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to GLV (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLV dropped -61.66% vs GLQ's -64.45%.

GLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLV and GLQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer