PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDQVX vs. AGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDQVX vs. AGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) and abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDQVX achieves a 15.53% return, which is significantly higher than AGD's 13.31% return.


HDQVX

1D
-0.19%
1M
6.70%
YTD
15.53%
6M
17.51%
1Y
26.40%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*

AGD

1D
0.16%
1M
2.19%
YTD
13.31%
6M
15.97%
1Y
37.00%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDQVX vs. AGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDQVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S
15.53%29.00%8.58%18.06%-8.69%11.67%5.11%18.91%-9.41%6.69%
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
13.31%34.31%16.39%7.36%-15.31%23.74%9.49%32.49%-14.98%9.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HDQVX and AGD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between HDQVX and AGD has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDQVX vs. AGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDQVX
HDQVX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
HDQVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDQVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDQVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HDQVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDQVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

AGD
AGD Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
AGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDQVX vs. AGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) and abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDQVXAGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.42

1.84

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

3.94

+4.78

HDQVX vs. AGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDQVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the AGD Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDQVX and AGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDQVXAGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.56

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.56

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.18

+0.55

Drawdowns

HDQVX vs. AGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDQVX drawdown since its inception was -28.56%, smaller than the maximum AGD drawdown of -76.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDQVX and AGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDQVXAGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-76.36%

+47.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-20.25%

+8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-20.25%

+7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.94%

-28.16%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-2.01%

+1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-29.89%

+25.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

9.42%

-6.28%

Volatility

HDQVX vs. AGD - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund (AGD) at 4.09%. This indicates that HDQVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDQVXAGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

4.09%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.02%

16.21%

-5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

23.88%

-10.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

18.95%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.84%

19.59%

-5.75%

HDQVX vs. AGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDQVX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than AGD's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDQVX vs. AGD - Dividend Comparison

HDQVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than AGD's 11.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGD
abrdn Global Dynamic Dividend Fund
11.05%11.41%10.46%8.35%8.25%6.45%7.47%7.50%9.17%7.22%8.89%8.77%
HDQVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S
6.52%7.52%6.41%2.94%4.25%4.63%3.29%3.26%4.24%2.16%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDQVX and AGD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDQVX has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to AGD (4.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDQVX dropped -28.56% vs AGD's -76.36%.

HDQVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDQVX and AGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer