HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO
HDIF.TO (Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units) and PLTE.TO (Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HDIF.TO returned 28.86% vs 10.84% for PLTE.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDIF.TO charges 2.47%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PLTE.TO.
Performance
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDIF.TO achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than PLTE.TO's -21.07% return.
HDIF.TO
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 12.52%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTE.TO
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- 1.02%
- YTD
- -21.07%
- 6M
- -20.59%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units | 11.54% | 13.56% |
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -21.07% | 159.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDIF.TO and PLTE.TO is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HDIF.TO
PLTE.TO
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) and Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDIF.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.08 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 0.26 | +3.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 0.50 | +13.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDIF.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | 0.19 | +2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.99 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.07%, smaller than the maximum PLTE.TO drawdown of -43.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIF.TO and PLTE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDIF.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -43.92% | +19.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.79% | -41.32% | +32.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -31.82% | +31.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -17.25% | +10.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 21.78% | -19.66% |
Volatility
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) is 3.50%, while Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (PLTE.TO) has a volatility of 18.90%. This indicates that HDIF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDIF.TO | PLTE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 18.90% | -15.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 42.12% | -31.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 56.11% | -43.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 69.55% | -52.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 69.55% | -52.06% |
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDIF.TO has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDIF.TO vs. PLTE.TO - Dividend Comparison
HDIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%, less than PLTE.TO's 40.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units | 10.21% | 9.93% | 10.15% | 10.62% | 8.95% |
PLTE.TO Harvest Palantir Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 40.53% | 23.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDIF.TO and PLTE.TO have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PLTE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PLTE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for HDIF.TO.
Their fees differ too: 2.47% for HDIF.TO and 0.40% for PLTE.TO.
Find the right allocation for HDIF.TO and PLTE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer