PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDIF.TO achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly higher than HBIX.NEO's -28.85% return.


HDIF.TO

1D
-0.73%
1M
6.52%
YTD
11.54%
6M
12.52%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
10Y*

HBIX.NEO

1D
-3.26%
1M
-19.49%
YTD
-28.85%
6M
-33.69%
1Y
-41.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HDIF.TO and HBIX.NEO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDIF.TO
HDIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

HBIX.NEO
HBIX.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBIX.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) and Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDIF.TOHBIX.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

0.87

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

-0.75

+4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.66

-1.33

+14.99

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the HBIX.NEO Sharpe Ratio of -0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDIF.TO and HBIX.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDIF.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.29

-0.81

+3.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

-0.62

+1.15

Drawdowns

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.07%, smaller than the maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown of -55.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIF.TO and HBIX.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDIF.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.07%

-55.90%

+31.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-55.90%

+47.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-52.88%

+52.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-23.75%

+17.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

31.57%

-29.45%

Volatility

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) is 3.50%, while Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that HDIF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBIX.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDIF.TOHBIX.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

11.40%

-7.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

41.52%

-31.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

51.62%

-38.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

50.94%

-33.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

50.94%

-33.45%

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDIF.TO has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than HBIX.NEO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDIF.TO vs. HBIX.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HDIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%, less than HBIX.NEO's 44.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HBIX.NEO
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF
44.52%20.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDIF.TO
Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units
10.21%9.93%10.15%10.62%8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDIF.TO and HBIX.NEO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBIX.NEO is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBIX.NEO is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for HDIF.TO.

HDIF.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HBIX.NEO is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 2.47% for HDIF.TO and 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDIF.TO and HBIX.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer