PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDGB.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HDGB.L is traded in GBP, while NUCG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NUCG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDGB.L achieves a 35.57% return, which is significantly higher than NUCG.L's -7.22% return.


HDGB.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
-11.66%
6M
18.47%
YTD
35.57%
1Y
59.95%
3Y*
-6.65%
5Y*
-12.57%
10Y*

NUCG.L

1D
-3.58%
1M
-14.59%
6M
-21.81%
YTD
-7.22%
1Y
7.34%
3Y*
33.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HDGB.L
VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF
35.57%10.07%-28.93%-40.46%
NUCG.L
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF
-7.22%44.98%34.19%-5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between HDGB.L and NUCG.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.43

The correlation between HDGB.L and NUCG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDGB.L
HDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

NUCG.L
NUCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NUCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDGB.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDGB.LNUCG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.06

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.25

+1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

0.53

+4.18

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the NUCG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDGB.L and NUCG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDGB.L drawdown since its inception was -80.00%, which is greater than NUCG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGB.L and NUCG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGB.LNUCG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.00%

-37.15%

-42.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.04%

-29.44%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.35%

-37.15%

-26.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-58.84%

-29.44%

-29.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.60%

-12.20%

-39.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.19%

13.89%

-0.70%

Volatility

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF (HDGB.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) have volatilities of 10.35% and 9.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDGB.LNUCG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

9.87%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.35%

27.99%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.10%

40.81%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.53%

34.99%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.61%

34.99%

-0.38%

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HDGB.L and NUCG.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

HDGB.L vs. NUCG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HDGB.L nor NUCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


HDGB.L and NUCG.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDGB.L and NUCG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

HDGB.L is categorized as Global Equities, while NUCG.L is Uranium. HDGB.L tracks VanEck Hydrogen Economy UCITS ETF, while NUCG.L tracks MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDGB.L and NUCG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer