PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEF vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEF achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 13.84% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEF has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 9.09%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.05% annualized return.


HDEF

1D
-0.95%
1M
3.70%
6M
8.55%
YTD
12.33%
1Y
23.62%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
11.81%
10Y*
9.09%
ALL TIME*
8.10%

VEA

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.27%
6M
7.42%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
29.71%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.05%
ALL TIME*
5.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.46M$3.74M$5.68M
$674.44M$796.70M$806.62M

HDEF vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
12.33%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.84%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and VEA is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.76

The correlation between HDEF and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEF vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEF
VEA

Financial Services

27.2%
23.1%

Consumer Defensive

20.0%
5.3%

Healthcare

17.2%
7.9%

Energy

10.4%
4.5%

Utilities

8.1%
3.1%

Industrials

7.6%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
7.3%

Communication Services

3.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.5%

Technology

0.6%
18.4%

Basic Materials

0.6%
6.9%

Financial Services

HDEF
27.2%
VEA
23.1%

Consumer Defensive

HDEF
20.0%
VEA
5.3%

Healthcare

HDEF
17.2%
VEA
7.9%

Energy

HDEF
10.4%
VEA
4.5%

Utilities

HDEF
8.1%
VEA
3.1%

Industrials

HDEF
7.6%
VEA
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEF
3.8%
VEA
7.3%

Communication Services

HDEF
3.7%
VEA
3.2%

Real Estate

HDEF
0.8%
VEA
2.5%

Technology

HDEF
0.6%
VEA
18.4%

Basic Materials

HDEF
0.6%
VEA
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEF vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HDEF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDEFVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.31

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

2.53

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

9.44

-0.82

HDEF vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEF and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEFVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-60.68%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-11.63%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-13.45%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-29.71%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

-35.73%

-0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-2.45%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-13.20%

+8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

3.10%

-0.30%

Volatility

HDEF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) is 3.31%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that HDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEFVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

5.40%

-2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

15.40%

-5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.67%

17.25%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

16.84%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.13%

17.21%

-1.08%

HDEF vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDEF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than VEA's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.70%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.57%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDEF and VEA have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to HDEF (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDEF dropped -36.43% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.05% vs 9.09% for HDEF. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.05% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HDEF.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 2.57% for VEA.

HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDEF and 0.03% for VEA.

HDEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEF and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer