PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEF vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEF vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEF achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEF has underperformed VEA with an annualized return of 8.59%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively higher 10.13% annualized return.


HDEF

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
4.87%
6M
7.11%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
8.59%

VEA

1D
0.24%
1M
4.15%
YTD
15.19%
6M
18.13%
1Y
32.11%
3Y*
20.11%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
10.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEF vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
4.87%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
15.19%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and VEA is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.77

The correlation between HDEF and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEF vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEF
VEA

Financial Services

26.9%
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

17.9%
5.6%

Healthcare

14.0%
8.2%

Energy

13.8%
5.4%

Industrials

8.8%
19.2%

Utilities

8.4%
3.3%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
7.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
2.7%

Basic Materials

0.7%
7.5%

Technology

0.6%
13.8%

Financial Services

HDEF
26.9%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Defensive

HDEF
17.9%
VEA
5.6%

Healthcare

HDEF
14.0%
VEA
8.2%

Energy

HDEF
13.8%
VEA
5.4%

Industrials

HDEF
8.8%
VEA
19.2%

Utilities

HDEF
8.4%
VEA
3.3%

Communication Services

HDEF
4.0%
VEA
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEF
3.9%
VEA
7.5%

Real Estate

HDEF
0.9%
VEA
2.7%

Basic Materials

HDEF
0.7%
VEA
7.5%

Technology

HDEF
0.6%
VEA
13.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEF vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEF vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDEFVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.77

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

10.82

-4.45

HDEF vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEF and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDEFVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.06

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.59

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.59

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.25

+0.20

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEFVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-60.68%

+24.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-11.63%

+3.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-13.45%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-29.71%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

-35.73%

-0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

-0.66%

-4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-13.29%

+8.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

2.98%

-0.37%

Volatility

HDEF vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) is 3.72%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that HDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEFVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

5.49%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

13.32%

-4.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

15.64%

-3.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

16.54%

-2.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.35%

-1.11%

HDEF vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDEF vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than VEA's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.62%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.61%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDEF and VEA have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to HDEF (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDEF dropped -36.43% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, VEA leads with 10.13% vs 8.59% for HDEF. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VEA has performed better with a 10.13% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HDEF.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 2.61% for VEA.

HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDEF and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEF and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer