PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HFQTX vs. HDQVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX) and Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HFQTX achieves a 12.76% return, which is significantly lower than HDQVX's 16.09% return.


HFQTX

1D
0.37%
1M
0.50%
YTD
12.76%
6M
14.81%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*

HDQVX

1D
0.48%
1M
3.87%
YTD
16.09%
6M
18.01%
1Y
27.08%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HFQTX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
12.76%29.80%7.08%10.40%-6.41%12.85%1.59%21.13%-15.74%7.75%
HDQVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S
16.09%29.00%8.58%18.06%-8.69%11.67%5.11%18.91%-9.41%6.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HFQTX and HDQVX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2017

0.93

The correlation between HFQTX and HDQVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HFQTX vs. HDQVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFQTX
HFQTX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HFQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HFQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

HDQVX
HDQVX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HDQVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDQVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDQVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
HDQVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDQVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX) and Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HFQTXHDQVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.39

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

8.61

+1.10

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFQTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the HDQVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFQTX and HDQVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HFQTXHDQVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.02

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.91

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.73

-0.17

Drawdowns

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFQTX drawdown since its inception was -34.53%, which is greater than HDQVX's maximum drawdown of -28.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFQTX and HDQVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HFQTXHDQVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.53%

-28.56%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-11.33%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.18%

-13.03%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.72%

-22.94%

+1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

0.00%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.77%

-4.53%

-1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.14%

-0.35%

Volatility

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T (HFQTX) and Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S (HDQVX) have volatilities of 4.55% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HFQTXHDQVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

4.63%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.50%

11.02%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

13.45%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.00%

13.65%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.88%

13.83%

+1.05%

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFQTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HDQVX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

HFQTX vs. HDQVX - Dividend Comparison

HFQTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.09%, less than HDQVX's 6.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDQVX
Janus Henderson International Dividend Fund Class S
6.49%7.52%6.41%2.94%4.25%4.63%3.29%3.26%4.24%2.16%
HFQTX
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
6.09%6.80%8.18%8.08%8.26%7.10%7.47%6.99%7.85%5.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


HFQTX and HDQVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDQVX has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to HFQTX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFQTX dropped -34.53% vs HDQVX's -28.56%.

HFQTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HFQTX and HDQVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer