ETJ vs. IGD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ETJ (Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund) and IGD (Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund) are both Global Equity Income funds. Over the past 10 years, ETJ returned 8.31%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for IGD. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ETJ charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for IGD.

Performance

ETJ vs. IGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETJ achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than IGD's 20.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ETJ has underperformed IGD with an annualized return of 8.31%, while IGD has yielded a comparatively higher 9.57% annualized return.

ETJ

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: -0.81%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 1Y: 3.88%
• 3Y*: 10.01%
• 5Y*: 2.88%
• 10Y*: 8.31%
• ALL TIME*: 5.43%

IGD

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 6.33%
• 6M: 18.95%
• YTD: 20.40%
• 1Y: 27.21%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: 9.57%
• ALL TIME*: 5.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	$1.01M	$1.00M	$1.07M
IGD Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund	$1.52M	$1.72M	$1.88M

ETJ vs. IGD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	0.82%	3.49%	29.55%	14.15%	-22.74%	11.92%	22.31%	26.78%	-7.03%	18.93%
IGD Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund	20.40%	18.22%	22.44%	1.00%	-5.01%	29.11%	-7.25%	16.91%	-16.19%	25.85%

Correlation

The correlation between ETJ and IGD is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007	0.52

The correlation between ETJ and IGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ETJ vs. IGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ETJ

ETJ Risk / Return Rank: 7
ETJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ETJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8

IGD

IGD Risk / Return Rank: 89
IGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IGD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IGD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ETJ vs. IGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ETJ	IGD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	2.23	-1.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.43	3.04	-2.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.38	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.27	4.34	-4.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.99	14.70	-13.70

ETJ vs. IGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the IGD Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETJ and IGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ETJ vs. IGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETJ drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, smaller than the maximum IGD drawdown of -59.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETJ and IGD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ETJ	IGD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.81%	-59.29%	+26.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-6.20%	-4.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.44%	-11.01%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.55%	-15.81%	-12.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.81%	-41.03%	+8.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.15%	0.00%	-1.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	-9.82%	+2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	1.83%	+1.03%

Volatility

ETJ vs. IGD - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund (ETJ) and Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund (IGD) have volatilities of 3.27% and 3.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ETJ	IGD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	3.31%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.53%	9.87%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.63%	12.07%	-0.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.63%	14.59%	+1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.97%	16.49%	+1.48%

ETJ vs. IGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETJ has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than IGD's 0.02% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ETJ vs. IGD - Dividend Comparison

ETJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.27%, less than IGD's 9.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETJ Eaton Vance Risk-Managed Diversified Equity Income Fund	9.27%	8.86%	8.16%	8.86%	11.68%	8.53%	8.79%	9.77%	11.23%	9.82%	12.46%	10.98%
IGD Voya Global Equity Dividend and Premium Opportunity Fund	9.16%	11.36%	11.44%	9.66%	8.87%	7.73%	9.20%	10.47%	12.49%	9.45%	13.23%	13.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ETJ and IGD in my portfolio?

ETJ and IGD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ETJ or IGD?

IGD has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to ETJ (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETJ dropped -32.81% vs IGD's -59.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.