HDB vs. SH
HDB (HDFC Bank Limited) is a stock, while SH (ProShares Short S&P500) is Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 (-100%). Over the past 10 years, HDB returned 5.46%/yr vs -12.83%/yr for SH. At a correlation of -0.53, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
HDB vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDB achieves a -33.85% return, which is significantly lower than SH's -6.39% return. Over the past 10 years, HDB has outperformed SH with an annualized return of 5.46%, while SH has yielded a comparatively lower -12.83% annualized return.
HDB
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- -33.85%
- 6M
- -32.66%
- 1Y
- -33.11%
- 3Y*
- -7.62%
- 5Y*
- -7.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
SH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -15.90%
- 3Y*
- -11.96%
- 5Y*
- -8.68%
- 10Y*
- -12.83%
HDB vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDB HDFC Bank Limited | -33.85% | 17.07% | -2.54% | 0.16% | 7.39% | -9.29% | 14.03% | 22.58% | 2.44% | 68.50% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -6.39% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDB and SH is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | -0.53 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between HDB and SH has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.53 to -0.32, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDB vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
HDB
SH
HDB vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HDFC Bank Limited (HDB) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDB | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.81 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | -0.82 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.74 | -1.47 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDB vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDB drawdown since its inception was -67.93%, smaller than the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDB and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDB | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.93% | -94.66% | +26.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.98% | -18.16% | -22.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.98% | -38.82% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.98% | -44.53% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.28% | -76.12% | +21.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.00% | -94.53% | +56.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.80% | -67.75% | +53.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.09% | 10.13% | +9.96% |
Volatility
HDB vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
HDFC Bank Limited (HDB) has a higher volatility of 8.37% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 4.33%. This indicates that HDB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDB | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.37% | 4.33% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.09% | 9.59% | +11.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.57% | 12.28% | +12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 16.91% | +9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 18.04% | +11.03% |
Dividends
HDB vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
HDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than SH's 4.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDB HDFC Bank Limited | 3.51% | 2.32% | 2.19% | 2.06% | 1.70% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.55% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.58% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.43% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDB and SH have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDB has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to SH (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDB dropped -67.93% vs SH's -94.66%.
SH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.22 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDB and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer