PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCVAX vs. TPDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund (HCVAX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCVAX achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than TPDAX's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, HCVAX has underperformed TPDAX with an annualized return of 5.36%, while TPDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.13% annualized return.


HCVAX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.80%
YTD
4.53%
6M
5.03%
1Y
12.67%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
4.00%
10Y*
5.36%

TPDAX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
10.43%
6M
11.92%
1Y
24.62%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
7.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCVAX
Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund
4.53%11.09%8.52%9.63%-13.42%5.38%8.75%13.79%-3.78%10.07%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
10.43%23.97%5.29%7.71%-5.63%12.15%8.83%13.77%-7.24%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HCVAX and TPDAX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between HCVAX and TPDAX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCVAX vs. TPDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCVAX
HCVAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HCVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HCVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

TPDAX
TPDAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TPDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TPDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund (HCVAX) and Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCVAXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

2.33

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.35

3.00

+0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.37

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.69

11.68

+1.02

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the TPDAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCVAX and TPDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCVAXTPDAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.83

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.72

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.59

+0.02

Drawdowns

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCVAX drawdown since its inception was -31.09%, which is greater than TPDAX's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCVAX and TPDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCVAXTPDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.09%

-22.29%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.67%

-7.58%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.41%

-7.58%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.45%

-17.58%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.45%

-22.29%

+3.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.00%

+4.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-4.92%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.19%

-1.17%

Volatility

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund (HCVAX) is 1.88%, while Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund (TPDAX) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that HCVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCVAXTPDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.88%

2.85%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.47%

9.49%

-5.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.55%

11.19%

-5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.93%

10.18%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

9.90%

-3.17%

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCVAX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TPDAX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCVAX vs. TPDAX - Dividend Comparison

HCVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than TPDAX's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCVAX
Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund
3.05%3.19%2.95%2.54%2.52%4.72%1.51%2.52%3.22%3.01%1.35%1.66%
TPDAX
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund
0.73%0.80%2.76%2.35%4.48%0.50%0.00%2.89%2.69%0.13%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCVAX and TPDAX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPDAX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to HCVAX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCVAX dropped -31.09% vs TPDAX's -22.29%.

TPDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCVAX and TPDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer