HCRB vs. HFGO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HCRB (Hartford Core Bond ETF) and HFGO (Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCRB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Hartford, while HFGO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HCRB returned 4.50%/yr vs 27.31%/yr for HFGO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HCRB charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HFGO.

Performance

HCRB vs. HFGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCRB achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than HFGO's 13.00% return.

HCRB

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 5.49%
• 3Y*: 4.50%
• 5Y*: 0.25%
• 10Y*: —

HFGO

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 9.66%
• YTD: 13.00%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 32.57%
• 3Y*: 27.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCRB vs. HFGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF	0.41%	7.06%	2.23%	6.98%	-14.61%	-0.17%
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF	13.00%	15.52%	40.73%	42.45%	-36.69%	-5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between HCRB and HFGO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021	0.16

Return for Risk

HCRB vs. HFGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCRB

HCRB Risk / Return Rank: 39
HCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
HCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
HCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
HCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 35

HFGO

HFGO Risk / Return Rank: 45
HFGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HFGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
HFGO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
HFGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
HFGO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCRB vs. HFGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HCRB	HFGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	1.82	-0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.46	-0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.31	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	1.83	+0.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.66	5.92	-0.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HCRB vs. HFGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the HFGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCRB and HFGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HCRB	HFGO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45	1.82	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.41	-0.27

Drawdowns

HCRB vs. HFGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCRB drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum HFGO drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRB and HFGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCRB	HFGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-44.64%	+24.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.82%	-18.29%	+15.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.18%	-25.19%	+19.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-0.10%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-16.13%	+9.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	5.67%	-4.75%

Volatility

HCRB vs. HFGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) is 1.30%, while Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF (HFGO) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that HCRB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCRB	HFGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.30%	4.47%	-3.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	13.86%	-11.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	17.96%	-14.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.13%	25.91%	-19.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.96%	25.91%	-19.95%

HCRB vs. HFGO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HFGO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

HCRB vs. HFGO - Dividend Comparison

HCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, while HFGO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HCRB Hartford Core Bond ETF	4.18%	4.12%	4.15%	3.39%	2.18%	1.47%	1.81%
HFGO Hartford Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCRB and HFGO in my portfolio?

HCRB and HFGO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HCRB or HFGO?

HFGO has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to HCRB (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCRB dropped -19.90% vs HFGO's -44.64%.

Which ETF is better, HCRB or HFGO?

On 3-year performance, HFGO leads with 27.31% vs 4.50% for HCRB. On fees, HCRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, HCRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HCRB or HFGO?

Over the 3-year period, HFGO has performed better with a 27.31% return vs 4.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCRB or HFGO?

HCRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HFGO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HCRB or HFGO?

HCRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 0.00% for HFGO.

What is the main difference between HCRB and HFGO?

HCRB is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while HFGO is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HCRB and 0.60% for HFGO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.