PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCRB vs. JBND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HCRB vs. JBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with HCRB at 0.41% and JBND at 0.41%.


HCRB

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.45%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*

JBND

1D
0.06%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCRB vs. JBND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HCRB
Hartford Core Bond ETF
0.41%7.06%2.23%7.95%
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
0.41%8.21%3.19%7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between HCRB and JBND is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023

0.96

The correlation between HCRB and JBND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCRB vs. JBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCRB
HCRB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JBND
JBND Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCRB vs. JBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) and Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCRBJBNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.45

1.53

-0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.16

2.29

-0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.27

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

1.89

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.66

5.88

-0.22

HCRB vs. JBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCRB Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the JBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCRB and JBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCRBJBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45

1.53

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

1.55

-1.41

Drawdowns

HCRB vs. JBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCRB drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, which is greater than JBND's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCRB and JBND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCRBJBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-4.48%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.94%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-1.56%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-1.15%

-5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.95%

-0.03%

Volatility

HCRB vs. JBND - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Core Bond ETF (HCRB) has a higher volatility of 1.30% compared to Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that HCRB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCRBJBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

1.23%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

2.70%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

3.83%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.13%

4.84%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.96%

4.84%

+1.12%

HCRB vs. JBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCRB has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than JBND's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HCRB vs. JBND - Dividend Comparison

HCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than JBND's 4.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HCRB
Hartford Core Bond ETF
4.18%4.12%4.15%3.39%2.18%1.47%1.81%
JBND
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF
4.40%4.42%4.58%1.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, HCRB and JBND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HCRB has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to JBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCRB dropped -19.90% vs JBND's -4.48%.

On 1-year performance, JBND leads with 5.82% vs 5.49% for HCRB. On fees, HCRB is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JBND has performed better with a 5.82% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HCRB is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JBND.

JBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 4.18% for HCRB.

They also come from different issuers: Hartford and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for HCRB and 0.30% for JBND.

JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCRB and JBND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer