HCOW vs. IVEP
HCOW (Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF) and IVEP (Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Amplify, while IVEP is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure Index. HCOW is actively managed, while IVEP is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HCOW charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IVEP.
Performance
HCOW vs. IVEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HCOW
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 4.48%
- 6M
- 4.26%
- 1Y
- 21.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVEP
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCOW vs. IVEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF | 4.05% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 8.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCOW and IVEP is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCOW vs. IVEP — Risk / Return Rank
HCOW
IVEP
HCOW vs. IVEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF (IVEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCOW | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCOW | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 2.62 | -2.10 |
Drawdowns
HCOW vs. IVEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, which is greater than IVEP's maximum drawdown of -7.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and IVEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCOW | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.15% | -7.34% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -3.31% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -1.97% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | — | — |
Volatility
HCOW vs. IVEP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCOW | IVEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 26.29% | -12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 26.29% | -8.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.60% | 26.29% | -8.69% |
HCOW vs. IVEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IVEP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCOW vs. IVEP - Dividend Comparison
HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, while IVEP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF | 11.73% | 10.88% | 8.13% | 1.99% |
IVEP Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCOW and IVEP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HCOW is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HCOW is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IVEP.
HCOW has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 0.00% for IVEP.
HCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IVEP is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Wedbush. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HCOW and 0.75% for IVEP.
Find the right allocation for HCOW and IVEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer