HCOW vs. DIVZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HCOW (Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF) and DIVZ (Opal Dividend Income ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HCOW returned 21.68% vs 10.40% for DIVZ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.

Performance

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a 4.48% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.10% return.

HCOW

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 3.03%
• YTD: 4.48%
• 6M: 4.26%
• 1Y: 21.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIVZ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 3.10%
• 6M: 3.41%
• 1Y: 10.40%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF	4.48%	5.76%	7.63%	6.44%
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	3.10%	16.72%	18.44%	3.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and DIVZ is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2023	0.66

The correlation between HCOW and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HCOW	DIVZ
Technology	21.0%	8.0%
Industrials	18.7%	4.6%
Financial Services	17.2%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	6.6%
Energy	8.2%	19.4%
Healthcare	8.0%	16.0%
Basic Materials	6.0%	5.7%
Communication Services	4.7%	5.9%
Utilities	2.8%	17.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	20.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

HCOW vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW

HCOW Risk / Return Rank: 53
HCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
HCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
HCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 44
HCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 62

DIVZ

DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 31
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 28
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HCOW	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.13	+0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	1.67	+0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.19	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	1.79	+1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	4.44	+6.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCOW Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCOW and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HCOW	DIVZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.13	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.89	-0.37

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and DIVZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCOW	DIVZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.15%	-15.42%	-8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.29%	-5.83%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-15.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-4.50%	+4.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.88%	-3.49%	-1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.35%	-0.40%

Volatility

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) at 3.33%. This indicates that HCOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCOW	DIVZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	3.33%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.74%	7.02%	+1.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.89%	9.28%	+4.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.60%	12.65%	+4.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.60%	12.57%	+5.03%

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HCOW and DIVZ have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

Dividends

HCOW vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, more than DIVZ's 2.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DIVZ Opal Dividend Income ETF	2.60%	2.60%	2.63%	3.66%	3.23%	3.83%
HCOW Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF	11.73%	10.88%	8.13%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCOW and DIVZ in my portfolio?

HCOW and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HCOW or DIVZ?

HCOW has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to DIVZ (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCOW dropped -24.15% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

Which ETF is better, HCOW or DIVZ?

On 1-year performance, HCOW leads with 21.68% vs 10.40% for DIVZ. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, DIVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HCOW or DIVZ?

Over the 1-year period, HCOW has performed better with a 21.68% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HCOW or DIVZ?

HCOW and DIVZ have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HCOW or DIVZ?

HCOW has the higher dividend yield at 11.73%, compared with 2.60% for DIVZ.

What is the main difference between HCOW and DIVZ?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and TrueShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.