HCMT vs. TSLL
HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and TSLL (Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HCMT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TSLL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HCMT returned 18.91%/yr vs -7.12%/yr for TSLL. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for TSLL.
Performance
HCMT vs. TSLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCMT achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly higher than TSLL's -37.67% return.
HCMT
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 6M
- 2.44%
- 1Y
- 32.49%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLL
- 1D
- -12.25%
- 1M
- -22.54%
- YTD
- -37.67%
- 6M
- -46.82%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- -7.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCMT vs. TSLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 4.79% | 7.39% | 39.14% | 6.45% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | -37.67% | -26.80% | 99.63% | -13.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMT and TSLL is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.55 |
The correlation between HCMT and TSLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
HCMT vs. TSLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCMT
TSLL
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
HCMT
TSLL
-
Financial Services
HCMT
TSLL
-
Communication Services
HCMT
TSLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
HCMT
TSLL
Healthcare
HCMT
TSLL
-
Industrials
HCMT
TSLL
-
Consumer Defensive
HCMT
TSLL
-
Energy
HCMT
TSLL
-
Utilities
HCMT
TSLL
-
Real Estate
HCMT
TSLL
-
Basic Materials
HCMT
TSLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCMT vs. TSLL — Risk / Return Rank
HCMT
TSLL
HCMT vs. TSLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCMT | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.04 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | -0.25 | +2.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.30 | -0.49 | +5.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCMT vs. TSLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, smaller than the maximum TSLL drawdown of -82.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and TSLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMT | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -82.88% | +46.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -54.75% | +39.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.26% | -82.88% | +46.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -68.52% | +61.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -53.92% | +45.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.15% | 27.78% | -21.63% |
Volatility
HCMT vs. TSLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) is 12.47%, while Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF (TSLL) has a volatility of 28.98%. This indicates that HCMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCMT | TSLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.47% | 28.98% | -16.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.67% | 56.84% | -37.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.47% | 89.07% | -62.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 106.91% | -77.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.01% | 106.91% | -77.90% |
HCMT vs. TSLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLL's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCMT vs. TSLL - Dividend Comparison
HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than TSLL's 8.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 0.40% | 0.43% | 2.75% | 0.63% | 0.00% |
TSLL Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF | 8.21% | 5.00% | 2.47% | 4.44% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCMT and TSLL have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLL has higher volatility (28.98%) compared to HCMT (12.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMT dropped -36.26% vs TSLL's -82.88%.
On 3-year performance, HCMT leads with 18.91% vs -7.12% for TSLL. On fees, TSLL is cheaper at 0.83% per year. On volatility, HCMT has been the lower-risk option at 12.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HCMT has performed better with a 18.91% return vs -7.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLL is cheaper with a 0.83% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for HCMT.
TSLL has the higher dividend yield at 8.21%, compared with 0.40% for HCMT.
HCMT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TSLL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for HCMT and 0.83% for TSLL.
HCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCMT and TSLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer