HCMT vs. CVSE
HCMT (Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF) and CVSE (Calvert US Select Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HCMT returned 43.14% vs 8.06% for CVSE. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HCMT charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CVSE.
Performance
HCMT vs. CVSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HCMT
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 11.17%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 43.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CVSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.06%
- 3Y*
- 13.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCMT vs. CVSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 11.17% | 7.39% | 39.14% | 5.67% |
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF | 0.00% | 10.14% | 19.11% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCMT and CVSE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HCMT and CVSE has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HCMT vs. CVSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HCMT
CVSE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
HCMT
CVSE
Financial Services
HCMT
CVSE
Communication Services
HCMT
CVSE
Consumer Cyclical
HCMT
CVSE
Healthcare
HCMT
CVSE
Industrials
HCMT
CVSE
Consumer Defensive
HCMT
CVSE
Energy
HCMT
CVSE
-
Utilities
HCMT
CVSE
Real Estate
HCMT
CVSE
Basic Materials
HCMT
CVSE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCMT vs. CVSE — Risk / Return Rank
HCMT
CVSE
HCMT vs. CVSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) and Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HCMT | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 2.66 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 5.71 | +1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HCMT | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.28 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.92 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
HCMT vs. CVSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCMT drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than CVSE's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCMT and CVSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCMT | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -20.29% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.27% | -3.08% | -12.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.89% | -1.68% | +0.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.24% | -2.69% | -5.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.01% | 1.42% | +4.59% |
Volatility
HCMT vs. CVSE - Volatility Comparison
Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF (HCMT) has a higher volatility of 5.80% compared to Calvert US Select Equity ETF (CVSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that HCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCMT | CVSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.80% | 0.00% | +5.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.58% | 0.00% | +16.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.21% | 6.49% | +17.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 13.87% | +14.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.48% | 13.87% | +14.61% |
HCMT vs. CVSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
HCMT has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CVSE's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
HCMT vs. CVSE - Dividend Comparison
HCMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than CVSE's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CVSE Calvert US Select Equity ETF | 0.59% | 0.81% | 1.05% | 1.22% |
HCMT Direxion HCM Tactical Enhanced U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | 0.38% | 0.43% | 2.75% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCMT and CVSE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCMT has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to CVSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCMT dropped -36.26% vs CVSE's -20.29%.
On 1-year performance, HCMT leads with 43.14% vs 8.06% for CVSE. On fees, CVSE is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CVSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HCMT has performed better with a 43.14% return vs 8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVSE is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for HCMT.
CVSE has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.38% for HCMT.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Calvert. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for HCMT and 0.29% for CVSE.
HCMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCMT and CVSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer