HCM vs. CXSE

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

HCM (HUTCHMED (China) Limited) is a stock, while CXSE (WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund) is China Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. Over the past 10 years, HCM returned -1.61%/yr vs 6.56%/yr for CXSE. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

HCM vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCM achieves a -16.50% return, which is significantly lower than CXSE's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, HCM has underperformed CXSE with an annualized return of -1.61%, while CXSE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.56% annualized return.

HCM

• 1D: 3.34%
• 1M: -2.71%
• 6M: -25.80%
• YTD: -16.50%
• 1Y: -35.55%
• 3Y*: -9.83%
• 5Y*: -23.34%
• 10Y*: -1.61%
• ALL TIME*: -1.84%

CXSE

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: -6.95%
• YTD: -4.21%
• 1Y: 6.61%
• 3Y*: 6.01%
• 5Y*: -6.44%
• 10Y*: 6.56%
• ALL TIME*: 4.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	$1.97M	$1.28M	$1.14M
HCM HUTCHMED (China) Limited	$548.11K	$557.29K	$576.81K

HCM vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HCM HUTCHMED (China) Limited	-16.50%	-7.49%	-20.43%	22.53%	-57.87%	9.56%	27.72%	8.58%	-41.43%	190.49%
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	-4.21%	37.00%	8.56%	-18.02%	-29.32%	-23.67%	59.39%	37.96%	-28.55%	81.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HCM and CXSE is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2016	0.40

The correlation between HCM and CXSE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HCM vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HCM

HCM Risk / Return Rank: 7
HCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
HCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
HCM Omega Ratio Rank: 8
HCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HCM Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CXSE

CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 15
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HCM vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HCM	CXSE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	0.22	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.47	0.46	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.06	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	0.28	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.56	0.49	-2.05

HCM vs. CXSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCM Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the CXSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCM and CXSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HCM vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCM drawdown since its inception was -82.18%, which is greater than CXSE's maximum drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCM and CXSE.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCM	CXSE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.18%	-70.01%	-12.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.50%	-17.70%	-26.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-54.13%	-29.83%	-24.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-82.18%	-58.78%	-23.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.18%	-70.01%	-12.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-74.08%	-48.76%	-25.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.66%	-28.06%	-12.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.95%	10.14%	+13.81%

Volatility

HCM vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison

HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) at 7.62%. This indicates that HCM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCM	CXSE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.21%	7.62%	+6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.10%	16.22%	+8.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.29%	22.60%	+14.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.56%	32.02%	+32.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.44%	28.79%	+30.65%

Dividends

HCM vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison

HCM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CXSE WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund	1.51%	1.95%	1.70%	1.71%	1.55%	0.86%	0.54%	0.96%	1.49%	1.24%	1.39%	2.50%
HCM HUTCHMED (China) Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HCM and CXSE in my portfolio?

HCM and CXSE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HCM or CXSE?

HCM has higher volatility (14.21%) compared to CXSE (7.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCM dropped -82.18% vs CXSE's -70.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CXSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.