HCKT vs. BMI
HCKT (The Hackett Group, Inc.) and BMI (Badger Meter, Inc.) are both stocks. HCKT operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while BMI operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, HCKT returned -0.15%/yr vs 15.80%/yr for BMI. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HCKT vs. BMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCKT achieves a -41.18% return, which is significantly lower than BMI's -21.01% return. Over the past 10 years, HCKT has underperformed BMI with an annualized return of -0.15%, while BMI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.
HCKT
- 1D
- 5.50%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- 6M
- -38.26%
- YTD
- -41.18%
- 1Y
- -49.20%
- 3Y*
- -19.66%
- 5Y*
- -6.48%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.07%
BMI
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- 6M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- -21.01%
- 1Y
- -23.67%
- 3Y*
- -5.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $94.66M | $74.07M | $68.25M | |
| $4.34M | $4.13M | $4.46M |
HCKT vs. BMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. | -41.18% | -34.74% | 37.26% | 14.15% | 1.48% | 45.86% | -8.83% | 3.08% | 4.05% | -9.27% |
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | -21.01% | -17.15% | 38.28% | 42.58% | 3.23% | 14.11% | 46.37% | 33.46% | 4.09% | 30.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCKT and BMI is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 1998 | 0.25 |
The correlation between HCKT and BMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.40 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HCKT:
$284.89M
BMI:
$3.97B
HCKT:
$0.53
BMI:
$4.27
HCKT:
21.29
BMI:
32.04
HCKT:
1.01
BMI:
4.57
HCKT:
4.31
BMI:
4.93
HCKT:
$296.56M
BMI:
$880.96M
HCKT:
$89.31M
BMI:
$363.92M
HCKT:
$32.08M
BMI:
$188.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCKT vs. BMI — Risk / Return Rank
HCKT
BMI
HCKT vs. BMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) and Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCKT | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 0.93 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.58 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -1.14 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCKT vs. BMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCKT drawdown since its inception was -96.32%, which is greater than BMI's maximum drawdown of -68.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCKT and BMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCKT | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.32% | -68.22% | -28.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.56% | -40.85% | -18.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.50% | -55.06% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.50% | -55.06% | -15.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.50% | -55.06% | -15.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.39% | -45.55% | -17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.32% | -19.11% | -47.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.04% | 20.76% | +14.28% |
Volatility
HCKT vs. BMI - Volatility Comparison
The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) has a higher volatility of 19.11% compared to Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) at 18.07%. This indicates that HCKT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCKT | BMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.11% | 18.07% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.64% | 40.26% | +10.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.42% | 45.04% | +7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.49% | 34.83% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 34.16% | +1.86% |
Dividends
HCKT vs. BMI - Dividend Comparison
HCKT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than BMI's 1.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMI Badger Meter, Inc. | 1.17% | 0.85% | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.78% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 0.99% | 1.14% | 1.03% | 1.16% | 1.33% |
HCKT The Hackett Group, Inc. | 4.24% | 2.45% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.16% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.23% | 2.12% | 1.91% | 1.47% | 1.24% |
Financials
HCKT vs. BMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Hackett Group, Inc. and Badger Meter, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HCKT vs. BMI - Profitability Comparison
HCKT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hackett Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.77M and revenue of 222.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
HCKT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hackett Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.94M and revenue of 68.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
BMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 39.38M and revenue of 222.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
HCKT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Hackett Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.28M and revenue of 68.80M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
BMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 29.72M and revenue of 222.32M, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HCKT and BMI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HCKT has higher volatility (19.11%) compared to BMI (18.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCKT dropped -96.32% vs BMI's -68.22%.
BMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCKT and BMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer