HBTC vs. UGA

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. HBTC is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -36.19% vs 85.57% for UGA. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.

Performance

HBTC vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -20.50% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 88.71% return.

HBTC

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 3.03%
• 6M: -24.64%
• YTD: -20.50%
• 1Y: -36.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UGA

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 16.18%
• 6M: 81.39%
• YTD: 88.71%
• 1Y: 85.57%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: 26.58%
• 10Y*: 17.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTC vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	-20.50%	1.18%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	88.71%	1.51%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTC and UGA is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	-0.07

Return for Risk

HBTC vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTC

HBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
HBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
HBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

UGA

UGA Risk / Return Rank: 84
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTC vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBTC	UGA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.30	2.40	-3.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.01	2.90	-4.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.79	1.38	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	4.23	-5.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.51	11.76	-13.27

HBTC vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is lower than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTC and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBTC vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and UGA.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTC	UGA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.45%	-86.59%	+46.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.45%	-20.32%	-20.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.11%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-75.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.22%	-5.75%	-31.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-36.61%	+20.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.99%	7.30%	+16.69%

Volatility

HBTC vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) is 6.05%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that HBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBTC	UGA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	11.35%	-5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.21%	31.71%	-12.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.93%	35.83%	-7.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.84%	34.67%	-5.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.84%	37.23%	-8.39%

HBTC vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTC vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.78%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	13.78%	10.96%
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTC and UGA in my portfolio?

HBTC and UGA have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBTC or UGA?

UGA has higher volatility (11.35%) compared to HBTC (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -40.45% vs UGA's -86.59%.

Which ETF is better, HBTC or UGA?

On 1-year performance, UGA leads with 85.57% vs -36.19% for HBTC. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HBTC has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HBTC or UGA?

Over the 1-year period, UGA has performed better with a 85.57% return vs -36.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTC or UGA?

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTC or UGA?

HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 13.78%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

What is the main difference between HBTC and UGA?

HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 0.75% for UGA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs -1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.