HBTC vs. LEGR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) are both Blockchain funds. HBTC is actively managed, while LEGR is passively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -31.57% vs 30.64% for LEGR. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LEGR.

Performance

HBTC vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly lower than LEGR's 12.39% return.

HBTC

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: -14.07%
• YTD: -21.27%
• 6M: -26.23%
• 1Y: -31.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LEGR

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: 7.23%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 6M: 15.64%
• 1Y: 30.64%
• 3Y*: 23.83%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTC vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	-21.27%	1.24%
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF	12.39%	21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTC and LEGR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

HBTC vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTC

HBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
HBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
HBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

LEGR

LEGR Risk / Return Rank: 64
LEGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
LEGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LEGR Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LEGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LEGR Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTC vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HBTC	LEGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	2.26	-3.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.62	3.10	-4.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.40	-0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	2.96	-3.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.58	11.21	-12.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HBTC vs. LEGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the LEGR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTC and LEGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HBTC	LEGR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.10	2.26	-3.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.70	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.58	0.60	-1.18

Drawdowns

HBTC vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -37.82%, roughly equal to the maximum LEGR drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and LEGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTC	LEGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.82%	-36.12%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.82%	-10.40%	-27.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.82%	-1.50%	-36.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.38%	-6.61%	-7.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.05%	2.74%	+17.31%

Volatility

HBTC vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison

Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 4.93%. This indicates that HBTC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBTC	LEGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.85%	4.93%	+1.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.63%	11.22%	+9.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.95%	13.62%	+15.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.66%	16.96%	+12.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.66%	20.31%	+9.35%

HBTC vs. LEGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LEGR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTC vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison

HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.92%, more than LEGR's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	13.92%	10.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF	1.67%	1.84%	2.40%	2.56%	2.64%	1.80%	0.95%	2.04%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTC and LEGR in my portfolio?

HBTC and LEGR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HBTC or LEGR?

HBTC has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to LEGR (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -37.82% vs LEGR's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, HBTC or LEGR?

On 1-year performance, LEGR leads with 30.64% vs -31.57% for HBTC. On fees, LEGR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HBTC or LEGR?

Over the 1-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 30.64% return vs -31.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTC or LEGR?

LEGR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTC or LEGR?

HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 13.92%, compared with 1.67% for LEGR.

What is the main difference between HBTC and LEGR?

They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 0.65% for LEGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.