PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBTC vs. BCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBTC vs. BCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly lower than BCOR's -2.23% return.


HBTC

1D
-1.09%
1M
-14.07%
YTD
-21.27%
6M
-26.23%
1Y
-31.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BCOR

1D
-2.77%
1M
-5.42%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
-9.89%
1Y
-17.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTC vs. BCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HBTC
Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF
-21.27%-5.05%
BCOR
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF
-2.23%4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTC and BCOR is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.74

The correlation between HBTC and BCOR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBTC vs. BCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTC
HBTC Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
HBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
HBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BCOR
BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTC vs. BCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBTCBCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

0.96

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

-0.40

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.58

-0.75

-0.83

HBTC vs. BCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the BCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTC and BCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBTCBCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

-0.42

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.58

0.04

-0.62

Drawdowns

HBTC vs. BCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -37.82%, smaller than the maximum BCOR drawdown of -42.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and BCOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBTCBCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.82%

-42.99%

+5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.82%

-42.99%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.82%

-30.84%

-6.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.38%

-18.11%

+3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.05%

23.12%

-3.07%

Volatility

HBTC vs. BCOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) is 6.85%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that HBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBTCBCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

10.49%

-3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.63%

31.45%

-10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.95%

41.24%

-12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.66%

42.93%

-13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.66%

42.93%

-13.27%

HBTC vs. BCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BCOR's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBTC vs. BCOR - Dividend Comparison

HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.92%, more than BCOR's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BCOR
Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF
3.17%3.10%
HBTC
Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF
13.92%10.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBTC and BCOR have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BCOR has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to HBTC (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -37.82% vs BCOR's -42.99%.

On 1-year performance, BCOR leads with -17.33% vs -31.57% for HBTC. On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, HBTC has been the lower-risk option at 6.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BCOR has performed better with a -17.33% return vs -31.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.

HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 13.92%, compared with 3.17% for BCOR.

They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 0.59% for BCOR.

BCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.42 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBTC and BCOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer