BCOR vs. CBTJ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BCOR (Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds. BCOR is passively managed, while CBTJ is actively managed. Over the past year, BCOR returned -33.02% vs -37.97% for CBTJ. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCOR charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTJ.

Performance

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCOR achieves a -12.51% return, which is significantly higher than CBTJ's -19.42% return.

BCOR

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -8.22%
• 6M: -20.02%
• YTD: -12.51%
• 1Y: -33.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBTJ

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -1.81%
• 6M: -22.44%
• YTD: -19.42%
• 1Y: -37.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF	-12.51%	5.68%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-19.42%	-10.82%

Correlation

The correlation between BCOR and CBTJ is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2025	0.76

The correlation between BCOR and CBTJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BCOR vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCOR

BCOR Risk / Return Rank: 3
BCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCOR	CBTJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	-1.43	+0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.03	-2.14	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	0.76	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	-0.90	+0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.28	-1.41	+0.12

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is higher than the CBTJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCOR and CBTJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCOR drawdown since its inception was -42.99%, roughly equal to the maximum CBTJ drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCOR and CBTJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCOR	CBTJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.99%	-42.41%	-0.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.99%	-42.41%	-0.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.12%	-41.19%	+3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.53%	-16.94%	-2.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	25.75%	27.00%	-1.25%

Volatility

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF (BCOR) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) at 4.47%. This indicates that BCOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCOR	CBTJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.03%	4.47%	+7.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.25%	17.25%	+16.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.03%	26.76%	+15.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.28%	25.04%	+18.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.28%	25.04%	+18.24%

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCOR has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CBTJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCOR vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison

BCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than CBTJ's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BCOR Grayscale Bitcoin Adopters ETF	3.60%	3.10%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.80%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCOR and CBTJ in my portfolio?

BCOR and CBTJ have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCOR or CBTJ?

BCOR has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to CBTJ (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCOR dropped -42.99% vs CBTJ's -42.41%.

Which ETF is better, BCOR or CBTJ?

On 1-year performance, BCOR leads with -33.02% vs -37.97% for CBTJ. On fees, BCOR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, CBTJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCOR or CBTJ?

Over the 1-year period, BCOR has performed better with a -33.02% return vs -37.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCOR or CBTJ?

BCOR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBTJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCOR or CBTJ?

BCOR has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 1.80% for CBTJ.

What is the main difference between BCOR and CBTJ?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BCOR and 0.69% for CBTJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BCOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.79 vs -1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.